| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,124 |
|
Valued Member
United States
288 Posts |
Don't see these too often. Thoughts on grade and issues. Thanks!  
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
419 Posts |
reverse looks weakly struck at claws and arrows. Nut appears uncirculated to me.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
461 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
AU-55 Reverse looks wizzed ? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6514 Posts |
@T-BOP.... What do you see on the reverse that makes you think it's whizzed vs just cleaned? I see the fine parallel scratches.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
461 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I would say die polishing lines. AU-55, quite a coin!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1339 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36800 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
@ chafemasterj , sorry wrong word used . :(
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18681 Posts |
AU55 weakness in strike particularly reverse. dies polishing striations most noticeable on reverse
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
clearly I don't know this series well since I thought more like MS-64
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
461 Posts |
I understand, nick. This is one of those barely circulated coins that "used to be" a 64. The reverse is most obvious. Look at the right side of the shield, the eagle's inner thighs, and, um, crotch.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
The brow hair shows wear as well - the bottom of the ribbon band is actually not complete.
Edited by Coinfrog 02/02/2019 7:01 pm
|
| |
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,124 |