| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,377 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1415 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
533 Posts |
Hard to be definitive from those pics, and because I am mearly a Noob (hence the name), but I will hazard a guess and say...  MS-63? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1267 Posts |
Hard to tell from the pic just how much disturbance is on the cheek. That said, I'd go ms63 as well.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1691 Posts |
SHINY...if I had to venture a guess MS-63
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
671 Posts |
I'll say MS-64...just to be contrary. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1130 Posts |
Just because the no mint was infamous for weak strikes, I'll give it a 64.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
533 Posts |
Oh, come on! Come up with an original idea! MS-63 was mine!
Lol, actuall, it makes me feel good to see that many people agree with me...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2049 Posts |
I was thinking 64 also before reading other people's input, mainly due to the known weak strikes from New Orleans.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6384 Posts |
It looks better than 63 to me. That dark area on Liberty's cheek appears to be a very shallow abrasion or perhaps a grease spot. The cheek otherwise looks very smooth and the reverse is almost mark-free. The reverse strike even looks decent for a 1904-O. I think it's a solid '64 and I wouldn't be totally shocked if PCGS gave it an MS-65. It's a nice one!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1691 Posts |
Common date...contact marks on face...not quite gem quality...IMHO
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1415 Posts |
 to MorganNoob, You not be such a Noob as you thought. To everybody else - thanks for the input Quote: Common date... I'm not too sure about that 3.7M versus 15M? Then again there is that melting issue. God, that sure confuses me Image: Us_2904O.jpg81.34 KB
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
Fields look nice. Cheek a little marked up. I'd say 64 as well.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,377 |
|