Posted 06/21/2019 09:23 am
I'm of the opinion that "experimental rinse" is just some error dealers trying to make something out of nothing.
There is no way to determine what exactly is the cause, there is no diagnostic to look for to identify one from any other toned Sacagawea dollar, one is just like another or any other dependent on circulation.
It's not hard for "an expert" to claim something is and get a grading company to put it on a slab for them.
Scientist or "experts" say one thing for decades just to find out they were wrong a half century later.
Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. You would likely have to send it to an expert for review, get their determination on it in writing then send it to get slabbed otherwise it wold just be slabbed as a normal 2000 P SAC dollar.
Just my 2 cents on the experimental rinse. I think it's a gimmick to make something out of nothing to make a buck for coins that toned early for whatever the reason was.
Also I don't think PCGS or NGS or ANACS will attribute them anymore they way they once did. I think they realized their mistake with them also.
I can be wrong though, maybe they will slab them given the right attribution by an expert, Like Fred Weinberg maybe.
There is no way to determine what exactly is the cause, there is no diagnostic to look for to identify one from any other toned Sacagawea dollar, one is just like another or any other dependent on circulation.
It's not hard for "an expert" to claim something is and get a grading company to put it on a slab for them.
Scientist or "experts" say one thing for decades just to find out they were wrong a half century later.
Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. You would likely have to send it to an expert for review, get their determination on it in writing then send it to get slabbed otherwise it wold just be slabbed as a normal 2000 P SAC dollar.
Just my 2 cents on the experimental rinse. I think it's a gimmick to make something out of nothing to make a buck for coins that toned early for whatever the reason was.
Also I don't think PCGS or NGS or ANACS will attribute them anymore they way they once did. I think they realized their mistake with them also.
I can be wrong though, maybe they will slab them given the right attribution by an expert, Like Fred Weinberg maybe.
Edited by Big-Kingdom
06/21/2019 10:31 am
06/21/2019 10:31 am
to the Community!
..Whats gotten into you ? I was in agreement with you until your last three sentences..
environmental damage of some sort. Salt it away as a conversation piece.
