| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,374 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
447 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188213 Posts |
Nice! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
I really like the draped bust series. XF45 perhaps? Great coin! 
|
|
New Member
Canada
17 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
447 Posts |
<<<I really like the draped bust series. XF45 perhaps? Great coin! >>> Actually it's NET VF-20. Net because there is a counter mark on the reverse. Can you find it?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6384 Posts |
Very attractive coin with original patina. I'd call it a solid VF-35 based on wear. I always thought the 1801 and 1802 dollars were smart buys. They are definitely less available than the 1799 and 1800-dated coins.
That "countermark" sure isn't obvious! Is it in the clouds? Several clouds look like they were lightly stamped with a circular tool. The result is still similar to the original design, so I can't be sure! The patina sure looks undisturbed.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1130 Posts |
Me likey. What holder is it in ?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
Quote: I'd call it a solid VF-35 based on wear. I guess I'm totally off-base and did not see the countermark. I actually went to Heritage and looked at a few slabbed XF40s that seem to have as much or more wear than yours. Here's one graded XF40 by NGC--what do others think?  I probably haven't studied this series enough to tell. 
Edited by KurtS 09/12/2008 5:29 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
447 Posts |
<<<That "countermark" sure isn't obvious! Is it in the clouds?>>> Eagles breast feathers, dead center above the shield. This piece does not reside in any holder. A raw Puppy. 
Edited by CCya 09/12/2008 5:41 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
I'd say XF40. Some underlying luster evident. Great coin! Congrats!
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
CCya, thanks...I really wouldn't know where to look. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6384 Posts |
My photos aren't too good, but here is my 1800 AMERICAI dollar, graded VF35 by PCGS. I judge CCya's coin to be approximately the equal of this piece in terms of wear. I do think the 1801 has a somewhat better strike on the reverse, especially on the eagle's head. My coin is choice for the VF35 grade if you can believe the dealer's story; he claimed it had been cracked out of an NGC EF-40 slab before being submitted to PCGS. It does have a trace of luster remaining around the stars and letters.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1415 Posts |
Both are nice coins  I'm jealous~~~
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
Thanks for posting the photo--it's interesting to compare the two. I'm better educated now.  I also think I'm seeing a little less wear on the cheek, forehead and nose of the first coin. There's more detail in the lower feather tips too. Then again there's that countermark, and I'm not PCGS--their grade obviously carries more weight than mine, lol. There's no substitute for seeing a coin in hand.
Edited by KurtS 09/13/2008 12:30 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
447 Posts |
some better pics;  
|
|
Valued Member
United States
64 Posts |
very nice, I once own a 1798 in XF sold it for 1500.00 back in 1995.
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,374 |
|