| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,432 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2335 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
171 Posts |
1858: Poor PO-01 obverse; AG-03 reverse
1859: Fair 02 Details, uneven wear; Fair-02 reverse
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'm at FR-02 on both, I think.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1660 Posts |
The ranges stated above are on target. Only collectible in this condition as type coins, might sell at 20$ tops.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2335 Posts |
Grade ranges are running about what I expected. Grades aren't quite low enough to interest low ball collectors (if there are any) and too low for about anyone else.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1312 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
Quote: Grades aren't quite low enough to interest low ball collectors (if there are any) and too low for about anyone else. There are actually a good amount of lowball collectors out there, but they like to have have their coins graded. Getting a straight grade PO-1 or FR-2 coin is actually a lot harder than most would think.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
I see them as FR-02 and PO-01.
I say PO-01 on the second coin because if there were much more wear on the obverse the date would not be identifiable resulting in an ungradeable coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
With the amount of corrosion both of these coins suffer, are they metal defector finds? To me, it looks like soil corrosion coins.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36782 Posts |
There's enough meat on each to squeak out FR-2.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,432 |
|