| Author |
 Replies: 23 / Views: 3,760 |
|
New Member
United States
47 Posts |
*** Edited by Staff to Add Year / Mintmark / Denomination to Title. Titles are Important! ***Does anyone think this could be an 1877. Also - if not - any idea on the year. Would one of the better slabbers like PCGS, NGC or ANACS put it in a holder stating a year. Thanks for your input ! 
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7936 Posts |
 Last digit looks rounded at the top in this photo, hence more like a 2, 3, 6 or 8. We have lots of experienced collectors of Indian Head cents out here who will give you a more expert opinion. Edited by tdziemia
01/16/2020 07:26 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8938 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7276 Posts |
Yep it's 1878, sure you can get it slabbed, I doubt you would get much for it though.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Russian Federation
5172 Posts |
I want to say 1872, but I'm not an expert, and it might look different in hand.
Definitely not a 7 in there, though.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
to CCF. 8 or 2 not a 7. Try taking the pic in black & white,the numbers might show up better. John1  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21601 Posts |
A TPG would only slab it if they can definitely make out the date. If they could, it may come back as a PO1 which would be a good Lowball IHC. |
|
New Member
 United States
47 Posts |
Thanks to all of you - in hand seems more like a 7 ( Wishful thinking ).
I thought possibly 1872 or 1878 if not 1877. Definitely not worth grading
for those. Thanks again - Bob ( New Member )
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
I too suspect a 2. Not worth having it graded |
|
Valued Member
United States
50 Posts |
I think its a 1872 not an 1878
|
|
Moderator
United States
188130 Posts |
to the Community! Your post was moved to the appropriate forum for the proper attention.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
789 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Reverse pic will clarify. to the CCF! |
|
New Member
United States
47 Posts |
Here is the reverse. Thanks again to all !!  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7276 Posts |
Well it's not an 1877 there is no softness in the lower portion of the N in one.
|
|
New Member
United States
47 Posts |
Figured not 1877 - just hoping. I didn't know they
had soft N's. Found this in a lot of 500 culls. Once
in a while there are some fairly valuable ones to be found.
|
| |
Replies: 23 / Views: 3,760 |
Posted 01/16/2020 07:13 am
