Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1944-D Lamiination & DDR?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 12 / Views: 994Next Topic  
Valued Member
adanak44's Avatar
Canada
207 Posts
 Posted 10/28/2008  10:12 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add adanak44 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
1944D Lincoln Cent, Is it call lamination error on the obv? Rev, show a lot of doubling is it a DDR or MDD? opinion please!






1944-D-Lamiination-&-DDR?

1944-D-Lamiination-&-DDR?

1944-D-Lamiination-&-DDR?

1944-D-Lamiination-&-DDR?

1944-D-Lamiination-&-DDR?

1944-D-Lamiination-&-DDR?

1944-D-Lamiination-&-DDR?

1944-D-Lamiination-&-DDR?

1944-D-Lamiination-&-DDR?

1944-D-Lamiination-&-DDR?
Pillar of the Community
KurtS's Avatar
United States
5318 Posts
 Posted 10/29/2008  12:08 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add KurtS to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'll throw out a guess for fun--correct me please:
Obverse: lamination error on planchet
Reverse: Machine Doubling
Valued Member
adanak44's Avatar
Canada
207 Posts
 Posted 10/29/2008  12:21 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add adanak44 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
KurtS.Thank you, will see what other opinions?
Pillar of the Community
TreasHunt's Avatar
United States
2540 Posts
 Posted 10/29/2008  06:47 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TreasHunt to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The white on the obverse makes no sense as a lamination, it should be the same color as the rest of the coin, these weren't copper plated zinc coins.

The doubling is machine/strike doubling.
Pillar of the Community
KurtS's Avatar
United States
5318 Posts
 Posted 10/29/2008  12:01 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add KurtS to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Actually, there's a plausible explanation for a bright streak in the coin.
From what others have said, planchet laminations begin as an impurity in the metal used to roll out the coin stock.
I believe that during 1944-45, shell casings were recycled to mint pennies,
and if impurities weren't completely mixed, they would be rolled out as streaks in the coining stock.
Planchet is stamped out, upset and struck, revealing a shiny impurity--implausible?
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
188130 Posts
 Posted 10/29/2008  12:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Plausible.
"Copper" Lincoln Cents have 5% Zinc/Tin.
You might have a white streak if either of those did not mix in well.
Bedrock of the Community
biokemist6's Avatar
United States
12437 Posts
 Posted 10/29/2008  12:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add biokemist6 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, it is possible to have off-metal contamination in a planchet and it would stand to reason that something like that could cause a lamination because of a weaker bond with the bronze. One cannot tell for certain what kind of metal it is without an in-depth analysis but the most likely possibility would be 90% silver. I would assume that the 35% silver alloy used for War Nickels would have oxidized to a darker color, tin/zinc impurities shouldn't be so stark white, and no Cu-Ni alloys were used on US coinage in 1944(I have no idea about any foreign compositions used during that time though) so that leaves 90% silver as the best candidate. If it is silver, that would certainly make this coin much more interesting. However, you would probably need an XRF analysis to determine the elemental composition for certain and that would not be a cheap test.

I would call it "Lamination with unknown impurity"
Edited by biokemist6
10/29/2008 12:34 pm
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
188130 Posts
Pillar of the Community
KurtS's Avatar
United States
5318 Posts
 Posted 10/29/2008  2:12 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add KurtS to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
However, you would probably need an XRF analysis to determine the elemental composition for certain and that would not be a cheap test.
Perhaps this could be an "added-value service" of the TPGs? Then, grading using SEM, followed by augmenting the Sheldon scale to decimal places...MS64.5, MS66.9, etc--collectors could really jockey for those population rankings.

Seeing that bright color, I first thought tin since it doesn't really tarnish over time, but Ag sounds very plausible too.
Edited by KurtS
10/29/2008 2:16 pm
Bedrock of the Community
biokemist6's Avatar
United States
12437 Posts
 Posted 10/29/2008  2:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add biokemist6 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
You are correct Kurt in that tin does not tarnish/corrode easily. However, tin will form a thin oxide layer on its surface that has a light greyish cast to it- this oxide layer is a protective patina. If the white balance of the photos is off, i.e. too white, then it could just as easily be tin. Since this Lincoln appears to be of a red-brown color, then the tin should have oxidized somewhat as well. The present photos make the contamination appear to be "too white" for oxidized tin.

With that said, my background is in chemistry/biochemistry and not metallurgy so I would say that I have a somewhat informed opinion but I am certainly not an expert.
Edited by biokemist6
10/29/2008 2:36 pm
Valued Member
adanak44's Avatar
Canada
207 Posts
 Posted 10/29/2008  9:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add adanak44 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you for all the inputs. Attach more images for the white spot. I have no idea why it look so white but that is the real color.



1944-D-Lamiination-&-DDR?

1944-D-Lamiination-&-DDR?

1944-D-Lamiination-&-DDR?

1944-D-Lamiination-&-DDR?

1944-D-Lamiination-&-DDR?

1944-D-Lamiination-&-DDR?

1944-D-Lamiination-&-DDR?
Pillar of the Community
KurtS's Avatar
United States
5318 Posts
 Posted 10/29/2008  10:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add KurtS to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Ping Szeto-
Those are interesting details! It sure looks like a whiter metal is interspersed within the bronze.

Quote:
With that said, my background is in chemistry/biochemistry and not metallurgy so I would say that I have a somewhat informed opinion but I am certainly not an expert.
I'm no expert either--just some general knowledge here--I appreciate your insights.
Pillar of the Community
coppercoins's Avatar
United States
7629 Posts
 Posted 10/30/2008  1:58 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coppercoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Obverse appears to have post-mint impurities in the crack of the lamination. nothing more.

Reverse is Machine Doubling. The letters were squashed by the die bounce. Doubled dies never look flattened.
  Previous TopicReplies: 12 / Views: 994Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.35 seconds to rattle this change. Forums