| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,342 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1998 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Can you post a more in focus photo? Leaning towards error. Weight? John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3237 Posts |
The fact that the image of Kennedy's profile is visible on the copper layer is a good sign, but well above my pay grade to weigh in definitively. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
791 Posts |
Massive delamination error?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
1998 Posts |
Weight is 10 grams, hopefully these OBV images are a little better  
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Just PMed Mike  John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4846 Posts |
definitely looks like a post-strike partial planchet split to me.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34401 Posts |
It will be good to get Mike Diamond's opinion on this, but it sure looks like a massive delam/split planchet to me.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
 Interesting find! The error makes up for the 25% of silver you're missing! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2734 Posts |
Half of the obverse clad layer separated and broke off after the strike. You're looking at the 80% copper / 20% silver core.
Error coin writer and researcher.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Thank you Mike,there you have it guys & girls a nice error. John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
This also peeled off after the strike. If it were pre-strike, then the devices on the non peeled area would be strong:   Because if it a ghost image, it peel off after the strike:  Can you see the differences?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188213 Posts |
Nice example! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1204 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,342 |
|