| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,276 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
357 Posts |
What would you think the approximate grade on this coin would be? Does toning affect overall grade?  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
663 Posts |
I'm not an expert at this, but I'll say AU-58
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll say MS-66. Most attractive.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
The lighting is not giving me a clear sense of the fields. Reverse is better than obverse, I'll say net MS64.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
357 Posts |
I tried to improve the lighting in this pic of the obverse. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19159 Posts |
Nice coin. MS65 for me. Hint of Die Deterioration ('new' photo). I like toning, some collectors do not. Subtle toning on modern coins typically does not erode the coin's grade--typically.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
with the new pic I'll bump my grade up a notch to MS65, nice coin, Jeffersons since about 2000 are tough to find without any big hits
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10284 Posts |
Toning cannot technically change the grade but I feel it does sometimes influence professional graders. Nice Jefferson! It isn't a satin coin from a mint set is it?
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
357 Posts |
I don't think it is a satin coin from a mint set, but not100% sure. It looks shiny not satin like.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10284 Posts |
Thanks for the clarification.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5029 Posts |
I am in at ms65. Nice coin. 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
357 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
79 Posts |
I'll tell you, I have many (why I don't know why ) that I won in Contests (somewhere else  ) and many like yours I feel are graded MS-65 . Toning is a personal thing I feel and doesn't effect grading .
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,276 |
|