| Author |
 Replies: 22 / Views: 2,682 |
|
Valued Member
United States
338 Posts |
Another Morgan grading feedback. Thanks in advance.   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5667 Posts |
The cheek looks pretty rough, I'd say MS-62, possibly PL.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6528 Posts |
Close up of that mint mark ple ASE |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
MS62/63, possible PL as well
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Too much flashback on left obverse field to see details clearly.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21786 Posts |
Tiniest amount of wear scuffing, both sides through the luster on the high points of the design, especially over Lib's ear. In hand examination of the high points with a 10x loupe should confirm.
AU-58 PL.
Those dings on Lib's cheek will certainly not help with the value - they are just so much at odds with the nice condition of relatively undisturbed luster in the fields.
Reverse obviously better, and perhaps a grade higher, but most MS-60 coins have more dings overall than this example.
Nevertheless, being a CC and PL, it is a desirable coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1298 Posts |
I'll go with PL, but better photos needed to accurately grade.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
I'm in the 62/63 PL crowd based on these images.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18657 Posts |
the 83(CC) is known for bold strikes. this one falls into that category. I cant comment on PL qualities as the lighting is washing out quite a bit of the surfaces. I'm at MS63 due to the obverse
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6528 Posts |
I would like to know what's going on with the MM and the 2 dots.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5667 Posts |
Could be die polishing inside the left C. The spots are probably just some flecks on the mirrored surface. Looks like it might be a VAM-8 based on the mintmark position.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
338 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
We know the cheek and neck are problem areas, but the obverse field details are still not clear. MS-63 at best, if that.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18657 Posts |
new photos help a little with the reverse which looks PL still not sold on obverse
|
|
Valued Member
United States
338 Posts |
This coin is killing me with picts due to the mirroring effect on both side. Gotta take a break,lol, on this one.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21786 Posts |
OP should know for himself about problem cheek area, after in hand examination with a 10x loupe just as the third party graders do.
I appreciate the problems with photography regarding PL fields.
Keith12 has a valid question regarding the mm.
I have to admit: I am unable provide the answer.
Edited by sel_69l
10/04/2020 6:01 pm
|
| |
Replies: 22 / Views: 2,682 |
Posted 10/02/2020 5:36 pm
