| Author |
Replies: 7 / Views: 1,063 |
|
|
New Member
United States
4 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34424 Posts |
@madcow, first welcome to CCF. Second, there is a scratch on this coin that kinda looks like a number 7-not an over date.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
Can we please see the whole coin (to all the edges), both sides? Not certain if you are photographing from a computer monitor or not (please don't). We cannot see your coin well enough from these photos to help you right now.  to the CCF! 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree, much larger pics needed.  to the CCF!
|
|
New Member
 United States
4 Posts |
Thanks y'all... I will add a few more photos. But it is a 7 not a scratch, I will try to take a picture showing the actual stamping of the number and how it travels through the 4... Will get pics up soon.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4692 Posts |
"it is a 7 not a scratch". Ok then why ask us? We will tell you it is not an error and you will insist that it is. And the earth is flat.
Edited by jimbucks 11/08/2020 9:14 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1657 Posts |
The 7 is just damage, looks like some spots of zinc corrosion. As stated clear larger pictures are needed.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Over dates are a 18/19th century thing that ended in 1908. Th dies were pretty much then each its own creation for several years. Slowly more and more was added to the hub. But we still had a few years that it continued, but it was the use of two different year hubs that caused these in the 20th century. These are consider doubled dies, as they had two different hubs that were used on them. But in the previous examples in the past, the digits were punched individually/gang punched into the dies for the dates. But since 1908 all the devices were on the hubs. Later when mintmarks were added to the coins, they were punched into the die until 1989. Then in 1990, the mintmarks were part of the design. Today they are pretty much normal. So to assume that they still happen, it kind of pointless to see something that looks like something, that is not raised, is not on the die. Most of the time they are incuse marks that are damage, or a stain on the surface of the coin.
|
| |
Replies: 7 / Views: 1,063 |
|