| Author |
 Replies: 8 / Views: 1,249 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4692 Posts |
No problem PCGS holder.   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5611 Posts |
Hello, JIMBUCKS, I see the slabbed coin. IMO, The coin shown is NOT getting is proper showing, The slab's marks are seen over the Grade of this Sweet Coin, Can you think about What I am seeing, I believe the coin, deserves More.... Best Wishes, ......  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Question - there seem to be several parallel, diagonal marks in the left reverse field - is this correct?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4692 Posts |
Frog. What appear to be marks are part of the toning. The toning appears much more mottled in the photos than in hand. Edit: Upon closer inspection it appears to be shallow "rays" that are part of the design. See the PCGS coinfacts page for pics of high grade examples that show these.
Edited by jimbucks
01/25/2021 8:11 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
In that case, I'll throw out MS-65. good shot at 66. Stunning coin whatever the grade.
Edited by Coinfrog
01/25/2021 7:04 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7028 Posts |
Tough to get a good call on this one due to the toning. However gold is always pretty to me..  i'll go 65+ |
|
Pillar of the Community
Russian Federation
1557 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21786 Posts |
I have to agree with morgans dad.
I have never done a screen grading of an example of this coin before, so it's going to be as the OP has suggested:- a guess.
I also see what coinfrog sees, and I also see two obvious dings below Liberty's knee.
The 10 % copper has given this coin a somewhat of an old gold toning - quite a common characteristic of British Guineas of a century older than this coin.
MS-63. PCGS may? say a grade higher, or may? end up agreeing with coinfrog.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4692 Posts |
Here is the answer  |
| |
Replies: 8 / Views: 1,249 |
|
Posted 01/25/2021 6:38 pm
