Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsCoin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Soviet Union, Unusual 1 Kopeck 1988, Help To Evaluate The Coin Please.

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 2,885Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member
norantyki's Avatar
404 Posts
 Posted 02/22/2021  05:55 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add norantyki to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
@gxseries - how is soberly presenting facts, with citation trolling?

Granted, fingerprints are an issue, which occur on modern mint products of many countries today - I never made the claim that Leningrad or Moscow were 100% perfect. You keep returning to minor varieties that again, all mints accidentally produce - the proportion of these to be found in Soviet coinage is relatively small, say in relation to say, that of the USA.

I don't see any cheap errors of any particular consequence (ie, more than a grazed rim clip, or some sort of PMD, which you inexplicably seem to believe are QC issues, or errors) from the period before the chaos of the meltdown of the Soviet Union having been sold recently on ebay, or any major auction house for that matter.

The issue of plastics is not a QC issue, but rather an oversight - and its exceedingly easy to find countries that struggled with similar issues, notoriously Spain and Belgium, whose PVC soft holders mean that today, virtually all sets suffer some issue or another. Generally, many mints didn't even think about the composition of their packaging, as the effects only became known years later.

As for the OP coin, I have explained, as per above, how certain components of the alloy can leach out and deposit themselves on the surface of the coin. I am not saying that I am necessarily correct, but this is a process that I have seen many times, and is so far the most plausible in this case. Weight variance here will be so minor as to likely not reveal much if anything.

Rather than name-calling and blustering, perhaps you can sit back and learn. Again, you started this by slandering me in another thread (something which I do not take at all lightly), and I still expect an apology.
Edited by norantyki
02/22/2021 07:55 am
Valued Member
Ezhik_Lt's Avatar
Lithuania
73 Posts
 Posted 02/26/2021  3:58 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ezhik_Lt to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
@OP - your coin looks like suffered from environmental damage but there is a very small chance of wrong planchet. Weighting the coin would give you an answer. BTW I never heard that there would be 1 kopecks coins minted using 10 kopecks planchet found previously dated 1988.

@gxseries - I'm with norantyki. Errors in Soviet mints were extremely rare and thus are extremely expensive. Some mules were pretty common like using 20 kopecks obverse die on 3 kopecks coins and vice versa but it was done with purpose to save on new dies and basically didn't affect the appearance of coinage. Poor plastic used for mint sets as well as finger prints shows only lack of attention to collectors expectations but has nothing in common with mint QA.




Valued Member
norantyki's Avatar
404 Posts
 Posted 02/26/2021  5:20 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add norantyki to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
@Ezhik_Lt - thank you for chiming in... Rylov outlines at lest 4 lines of QC at Leningrad, and although there likely was the occasional malpki and berlinki break, and the usual 'friday phenomenon,' those who study the coinage of the Soviet Union know that the mint generally operated to a good standard - gxseries owns many coins, but apparently doesn't know much about them... my take is that printed books are better than youtube videos, or random google searches in terms of the acquisition of knowledge.
Pillar of the Community
Australia
3831 Posts
 Posted 02/27/2021  08:09 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add gxseries to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Ezhik: clipped / planchet flaws are as cheap as 5 dollars each. Rotated die errors for less than 50 dollars. Many mules can be obtained under 100 dollars. This is a bargain compared to many Asian error coins that I have been hunting for years.

As far as I am concerned, you cannot divorce mint set packaging from coins. That's the equivalent of buying a new car just to find out there are component issues and saying there is no QA issue with the manufacturer. It does affect the mint reputation regardless. It did take 15+ years to resolve afterall.

My partial coin collection http://www.omnicoin.com/collection/gxseries
My numismatics articles and collection: http://www.gxseries.com/numis/numis_index.htm
Regularly updated at least once a month.
  Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 2,885Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to rattle this change. Forums