| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 1,976 |
|
Valued Member
United States
78 Posts |
Something a little more interesting... I can't quite decide on this one after consulting the online photograde. The pics aren't the best. They show proper detail, but the coin in hand looks whiter than the picture. Some luster left, more on the obverse than the reverse. A little beat up to be sure.. but a nice date.   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
maybe AU-50 ? Year and mintmark is not known for its strike
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
XF45/AU50, tough to get a good feel for the surfaces.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5676 Posts |
I'd say AU-50, although the reverse rim damage might be a problem.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'm at EF-45, no sense of luster.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18696 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36844 Posts |
I agree with those at EF-45.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
465 Posts |
EF 45 unless a fair amount of luster then AU 50. I believe this coin is generally soft struck.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
78 Posts |
Didn't see this one coming. Part of the learning curve. In retrospect, I can see that the luster is mostly gone.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
When I looked at the first two pictures, my first thought was cleaned, but no hairlines visible. If no hairlines on coin from cleaning, it may have been dipped. I put the coin at XF 40/45. It is a money coin and PCGS was very hard on the grading.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
I can not say on the cleaning though it did not look that way in the photo the VF part has me scratching my head . I think minimum XF-45 looking
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
I'm guessing they saw the halos around the obverse stars and date as a sign of a previous dip.
I'm still at EF45 for the grade.
|
| |
Replies: 18 / Views: 1,976 |
Posted 07/06/2021 9:47 pm
