| Author |
Replies: 7 / Views: 1,082 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
205 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Does not look PL and the staining takes away the eye appeal, IMHO. John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5661 Posts |
PL 1921 Morgans are very uncommon. Yours shows some signs of cleaning, which may make the surfaces more reflective.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4468 Posts |
As noted above from photos, the coin does not appear to be PL. Mirror depth is difficult to pick up from photo when trying to determine if a coin is PL. A proof like coin needs 2" to 4" of mirror clarity. On a PL, the frost on devices is not a written requirement but the contrast between devices and fields does helps get the coin graded PL. From photo a PL coin can be shown with black fields and contrast devices. Below is a photo of how a coin can be shown that it is PL: 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
Again I am in the same boat as on the Denver 1921 you posted, not PL and not even mint state. I'd grade this coin at EF45 to AU53.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6507 Posts |
 With Zurie. I think its cleaned
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 7 / Views: 1,082 |
|