| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,530 |
|
New Member
United States
14 Posts |
I know it's pretty beat, but thought I share. Never found a serial number below a 1000 before. 
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
Thats really low. Congrats!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Not a big premium, but definitely worth keeping.  to the CCF!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7273 Posts |
Considering the condition it's not worth much, but I would keep it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
Definitely worth keeping in my book.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
 . Technically not a low SN, But I would keep it. John1 
|
|
New Member
 United States
14 Posts |
Thanks for the responses. Yes, I'll put this with my keepers.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12817 Posts |
Hey, congrats! Nice find. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
691 Posts |
The numbers themselves might be small but with a suffix of N is it really a "low serial number"?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Many (not all) collectors do not consider the block letters a part of a "fancy" serial number's appeal.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188011 Posts |
Very nice! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4637 Posts |
Nice find. I'd be keeping it if I found it in the wild.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
800 Posts |
Quote: The numbers themselves might be small but with a suffix of N is it really a "low serial number"? I'm at a loss on this one. Is there something that I'm not seeing? 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I think this was a reference to the fact that, in truth, this note was printed far into the production run based on the block letters.
Edited by Coinfrog 07/26/2021 9:27 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4691 Posts |
Most people don't really take into account the block numbers with regards to low serial numbers. I'm in that camp. For instance, consider these notes, they have low serial numbers but high "series" numbers so they were not early prints for 1862, but early for the given series. I would consider them low serial numbers. I think, but am not sure, series numbers back then were the rough equivalent of block numbers today. 
Edited by jimbucks 07/26/2021 10:11 pm
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,530 |