| Author |
 Replies: 14 / Views: 1,449 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
171 Posts |
1921 D Morgan, What do you think? Looking for for general opinions and grades. Thanks!!   |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
The coin has wear of an AU example, but no luster in the protected areas. I suspect maybe an old cleaning. XF45
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1298 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18654 Posts |
reverse holds this one to AU50
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
AU55. It looks like it may have been proof-like when fresh from the mint.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6384 Posts |
Certainly AU for detail. May have been cleaned but if so it wasn't too harsh.
For a circulated common-date dollar like this a cleaning makes little difference to the value.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1273 Posts |
No higher than AU50 in my opinion.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1767 Posts |
I'll also say AU-55 and agree with dave700x. This was a stunner when it left the mint.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
171 Posts |
Yes in hand it does look like is is almost proof like. The fields really reflect the light, I don't have a camera setup to really catch it in its current AU state.
In my opinion it looks decent, but the moving it in the light to check it out really makes it pop. I can't say for sure if its been cleaned or not as the scratches could just be from use.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
465 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
No better than AU-50 for me. No evident luster and she's seen quite a bit of circulation.
Edited by fenton
08/12/2021 7:37 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36710 Posts |
AU-55 with some strike weakness on the reverse.
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,449 |
|
Posted 08/11/2021 09:34 am
