| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,114 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
104 Posts |
I found this gem in my register just a minute ago. I thought it looked cleaner than it is before I took the photos. About what would yall grade her at?   Edited by PNWHiker 09/15/2021 10:03 am
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15419 Posts |
Nice find for face value. Grade XF to low AU To clarify what appears to be a misunderstanding in your topic title - the 'W' seen on the obverse is the first initial of the coin designer last name ( Adolph Weinman). If you look on the reverse to the right of ONE you'll see the 'S' mintmark making this coin a 1942-S that was struck in San Francisco.
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
104 Posts |
I finally noticed that. Its from San Francisco!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34402 Posts |
I can't help with grading, but I did want to congratulate you on a super find in the wild. Well done.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
104 Posts |
At first nonchalant glance I assumed canadian. Then got super stoked when I noticed. My coworkers asked if everything was ok haha
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19150 Posts |
I could go with low to mid AU. Outstanding find.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Wow , nobody thought it was plated at one time  AU-58 Details . I could be wrong .
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
Quote: I thought it looked cleaner than it is before I took the photos. Join the club! I feel this way about a lot of coin shots I take. Downside to grading via photos. Some show and exaggerate the most minute and irrelevant marks, others can hide them. Grade wise, I'm in the AU camp, looks like it might have been cleaned/lightly polished at one point. Worth a small premium over melt. A great find in the wild! 
Edited by Ty2020b 09/15/2021 09:07 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18662 Posts |
cool find. AU58. not sure if the overall eye appeal due to all the field marks will knock it to AU55 or pull a details designation.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1772 Posts |
I think it looks polished. AU details - but a great find!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1173 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
AU58 my guess is someone got it as ms and rubbed it with their shirt of whatever and therefore the rub and polished look.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5178 Posts |
IF graded problem free, then I say AU-53.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1086 Posts |
Nice find! I'd have to say AU-58 and maybe details-cleaned
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,114 |
|