| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 1,906 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3546 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
Surfaces are not original. AU-50 Details Cleaned
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3546 Posts |
Just for the record, the color of the reverse is exactly the same as the obverse in hand.
The difference shown is a result of a lighting change.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7620 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll say AU-55. Original surfaces? Attractive in any event.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36745 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3546 Posts |
Quote: ...cleaned How does one tell it's cleaned or not on this AU coin without luster?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11888 Posts |
Usually a small coin like this at the AU level will have some luster remaining near protected areas like raised devices in the design. This is because luster is usually flattened out of existence through rub. A coin that looks like it has sterile, even, non-lustrous surfaces appears to have taken a bath in a chemical that removed the luster, even in protected areas. Although it is not foolproof, it does suggest strongly that this happened. A coin can be uncirculated, dipped and therefore cleaned. The coin also does not look like it has acquired any significant toning through oxidation so the dip appears to be more recent. The coin does not look overdipped, which usually refers to the chemical visibly eating into the metal's surface. It also doesn't look like it was cleaned via a brush because I don't see lines on the coin. Looks like it took a short dip to clean up the surfaces but in the process obliterated the luster.
Edited by numismatic student 11/04/2021 3:03 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
AU50 Market acceptable old cleaning. I am not seeing any luster.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1788 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
I'm at AU Details, cleaned, as well. Surfaces look quite flat and sterile.
Edited by Ty2020b 11/04/2021 3:41 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3546 Posts |
Quote: ...dipped Would it be too general to state that dipping (even a quick one) would destroy luster on 'any' coin?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11888 Posts |
That depends on the strength of the acid in the dip solvent. Different chemicals will react with coins differently.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6385 Posts |
I have used E-Z-Est cleaner on common silver coins, with mixed results. A very brief (like, 3 seconds) dip can remove tarnish without dulling the luster. Very important to rinse all the dip off the coin immediately to prevent further color changes and spotting.
I'd only dip uncirculated silver coins of relatively low value.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3546 Posts |
Since we're chatting about dipping, I don't think it would stray too far to convey what some guru told me at a coin show. He saw some faint scratch marks at obv 10 near the left side close to Liberty's face on a SL 10C. The coin was borderline 58/60. He was afraid that these lines could indicate a past cleaning and keep it from an MS+ grade. It's my understanding that any 'cleaning' lines no matter how small of any area are considered to have disturbed the original patina; a coin like this therefore could only get a 58 max or a BU if the TPG is more lenient. This first guru said that a quick 2 second dip followed by a double dip in water would 'probably' eliminate these lines, possibly increase the grade two levels at most and preserve the luster. Another guru at the same show completely disagreed and felt that dipping this same coin would ruin it. This guy felt that the lines would become even more pronounced after the dip. Any opinions on this would be welcome insofar as relating past experiences etc.
|
| |
Replies: 19 / Views: 1,906 |