| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,006 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
Curious your thoughts on this one. Semi pleasing to me .  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1694 Posts |
Well regardless thoughts on here I bit and bought it haha
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7621 Posts |
Nice lightly circ 80-cc. I'd call it AU50'ish.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
599 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1173 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
AU50 seems right. It's not a reverse of '78 but at least it has the mint mark of '78. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5672 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2281 Posts |
I'm at AU-50 as well.
You realize when you know how to think, it empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
Looks like a nice original example XF 45. The scratches in the neck area are a little distracting.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
I'll say XF45, but I can see them calling it AU50.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3655 Posts |
Obverse AU-50, reverse EF-45, another one of my hoped-for future EF-48 coins. Definitely a decent coin for the grade.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11896 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1694 Posts |
AU-50 is correct Graded by PCGS I really like a lightly circulated Morgan especially a CC
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18673 Posts |
Had this at AU50 also. barring the circulation wear the coin looks like a weaker strike since this year is typically sharp and bold
|
| |
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,006 |