Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsCoin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1939-P Wheat Cent - Strange Date, Possible Error?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 23 / Views: 2,712Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member
yung_bath_salts's Avatar
United States
77 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2022  4:02 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add yung_bath_salts to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Hello Coin Community,

Pictured below is a 1939-P Wheat cent with a strange bend on the 1. Curious if this is a legitimate error or some type of strange post-mint damage.

Thank you!


1939-P-Wheat-Cent---Strange-Date,-Possible-Error?
Pillar of the Community
silviosi's Avatar
Canada
6244 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2022  4:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add silviosi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
First time I see this. Some will say it is material move from an PMD. I will like to see hole coin photos R and O to see if it is an legitimate coin or not. For this year was some counterfeit saw around.
Valued Member
yung_bath_salts's Avatar
United States
77 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2022  4:16 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add yung_bath_salts to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
OBV & REV Photos as requested


1939-P-Wheat-Cent---Strange-Date,-Possible-Error?
1939-P-Wheat-Cent---Strange-Date,-Possible-Error?
Pillar of the Community
silviosi's Avatar
Canada
6244 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2022  4:23 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add silviosi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It is a legitim mint coin with no doubt (by the design), an XRF will can confirms, but all fake Wheat cent could be detect by the reverse. So IMO it is an error of the punch of the date digits. I have no clue how to attribute, but for me it is clear is no way to be an move material on this pseudo "1".
Edited by silviosi
07/10/2022 4:26 pm
Bedrock of the Community
ijn1944's Avatar
United States
19167 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2022  4:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ijn1944 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Post-strike damage involving the date. A hit from long ago moved the metal--copper is a relatively soft material.
Pillar of the Community
United States
797 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2022  5:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add JTCC to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This coin has sustained a hit in circulation that displaced the metal of the digit 1.
Pillar of the Community
mrwhatisit's Avatar
United States
2955 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2022  5:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mrwhatisit to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I am not sure why counterfeiters would want to fake a very common wheatback

Counterfeit means the whole coin is fake and not done by our mints, an alteration is a genuine coin that has been tampered with somehow. That said, this 1939 is neither, the one in date got a strange bit of post mint damage.
Moderator
Learn More...
John1's Avatar
United States
56855 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2022  5:34 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
PMD
John1
Bedrock of the Community
merclover's Avatar
United States
10635 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2022  5:53 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add merclover to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Post mint damage to the date.
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2022  6:04 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Agree, just an odd circulation hit.
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
96465 Posts
Pillar of the Community
silviosi's Avatar
Canada
6244 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2022  6:49 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add silviosi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Well, well. I have to answer. I do not to contradict all the forum, and majority of you with such enormous knowledge, but in this case I will point why I state what I state. My state is base on the first the distance of the 1 to the 9.DO not fit.

Secnod I took the picture (forgot to ask the permission) and on transparency overlaps to a normal coin. The results it is that this 1 no fit exact with the curve of the first 9.
Third: the end of the 1 bottom fit with the end of the first 9.
Forth: I do not see any kind of marks of the moved or dispatch material.

YOUR OPINION PLEASE.
RW
The last it is to respond to MRWAHTITIS.: I saw before sets of 1930 to 1969 fake coins put in the market. Sure the 1939 it is not an valuable coin but someone some where do those fake sets. Was discovered and then stop. I never have a back from authority with the result or the origin. I took retirement at last 1st July from this consulting, so from now I will stand only with what I know.

Sorry if I batter you or disturb.

All my best,
silvio
Edited by silviosi
07/10/2022 6:52 pm
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2022  6:56 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The field scrapes that perhaps accompanied the long-ago hit (or hits) that curiously reshaped this digit have long since disappeared with wear. Believe me, there is no other explanation for this deformity.
Pillar of the Community
silviosi's Avatar
Canada
6244 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2022  7:00 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add silviosi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Or maybe when the date was punch was a wrong NO date and then the Die worker re-polish and release without say made a mistake. Happened before this date and after.
Moderator
Learn More...
Spence's Avatar
United States
34418 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2022  7:36 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Spence to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It sure looks like damage to me.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb

"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Cujohn's Avatar
United States
7174 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2022  8:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Cujohn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Silviosi, If this was a punched wrong die, how could they not produce thousands of them before they discovered the error. This is the first one found in 80 years? Not too possible. I think a lot of PMD is explained by Hocum's razor.
  Previous TopicReplies: 23 / Views: 2,712Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.46 seconds to rattle this change. Forums