| Author |
Replies: 36 / Views: 3,507 |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3634 Posts |
As the title says, a 1938 LWC in PCGS MS67+ (with a CAC sticker) just sold for $6455 on Great Collections ($5738 plus 12.5% buyers premium). I was bidding on it but bailed out late this morning when the price started shooting up. PCGS price guide is $460, and a PCGS MS67+ sold on Heritage in May for $504, though without a CAC sticker. PCGS census is 42 in MS67+ with a single example at MS68. Evidently two bidders were willing to bet this coin will re-grade as an MS68! *** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. ***
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
So almost $6,000 more just for a CAC sticker . 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
To me, the definition of insanity. For a common date? Does PCGS have a time limit on their warranty for red coins like NGC does?
Edited by Coinfrog 07/24/2022 8:57 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19111 Posts |
The marketplace--warts and all. Life is grand.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5177 Posts |
The seller must be elated!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
3634 Posts |
Quote: So almost $6,000 more just for a CAC sticker Hopefully this wasn't someone who thought the CAC sticker meant it had a great chance of getting a 68 on regrading. Especially since CAC ignores the + and only gives the sticker for being solid for the numeric grade. On the small chance it was given a 68 on regrade, it's possible the buyer would come out ahead since the PCGS pop is only 1 in 68. However, I know I can't tell the difference between a 67+ and a 68, and I'm sure as heck not willing to bet that much money on it...
Edited by hokiefan_82 07/24/2022 10:11 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
357 Posts |
Must be nice to have that kind of money to blow.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
3634 Posts |
Quote: Does PCGS have a time limit on their warranty for red coins like NGC does? Coinfrog, PCGS doesn't guarantee the color on copper coins at all. From the PCGS website: Quote: We've also made a change in how we handle the guarantee of color for copper coins. The fact is that color for copper can change depending upon where a coin is stored. The villain is humidity, and if you have mint red copper coins stored in Hawaii or Florida, for example, there's a good chance that the environmental factors can alter the color of the coins. This is obviously beyond our control so consequently we will not be guaranteeing the color of copper coins graded or sold after January 1, 2010.
Edited by hokiefan_82 07/25/2022 12:09 am
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Quote: , PCGS doesn't guarantee the color on copper coins at all. From the PCGS website: Makes sense to me ; A red cent can turn over time even in a PCGS slab .
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3402 Posts |
...67 with CAC sticker...67+...68...can anyone tell the difference...what has happened to the hobby of coin collecting? Is a mark on a coin the size of a flea on an elephant's behind really significant?
KK
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10029 Posts |
Quote: ...67 with CAC sticker...67+...68...can anyone tell the difference...what has happened to the hobby of coin collecting? Is a mark on a coin the size of a flea on an elephant's behind really significant? This section of numismatics obviously is NOT the coin hobby. It is a market-created, based on nothing verifiable, slab+label+coin hobby. But since there are people who enjoy it (and what is a hobby for anyway?), it continues to drive prices up to astronomical levels. through marketing ideas such as the registration sets. These were a genius marketing idea to drive up the costs of better graded slabs. Create competition and make it a game some will enjoy playing. And...this was predicted by some back of us back in the days when these companies first set themselves up as THE hobby experts in order to find a way to make money from the coin hobby. Although we never thought something like a CAC sticker could come into being b/c we said the concept was ludicrous enough no one would fall for it (that is what we said - it is not an insulting statement made for this post). None of this is saying the companies are evil. These were and are businessmen who are just trying to make a living with a business and so have set up a huge system some people enjoy being a part of. Unfortunately the system pulls in a lot of newbies who do not do things like read the PCGS guarantee themselves to see how it actually does very little (exception: when PCGS grades a fake coin as genuine) except put PCGS ahead, and the owner ends up with a lot less than they were expecting/due considering how the guarantee is highly touted in the marketplace. In the 1990s they all abandoned the more accurate (their words when marketing it) computer systems (they spent a $lot$ to develop) that would give an actual grade eliminating "human error," and they all went back to the less accurate (their words when marketing the computer system) system they currently use. Of course the companies now saying they would be able to give the actual scientifically derived grade of the coin, may have been killing a huge area of profits: The crack out and re-submit phenomenon that naturally occurs when there is no scientific and verifiable standard used to come up with a grade. A business wanting to survive would move (and they all did) back to the error-prone (as they called it when pushing the computer based system) human system. Business will go where the money is. People will enjoy hobbies different ways. I personally see numismatics as being about coins. Some people see numismatics it as being about plastic+label (changeable if resubmitted) and all it does to make marketing fun while including coins. I do not appreciate the large negative effects the latter side of the issue has had on the former. But since people will enjoy what they want to (what are hobbies for?), some of us saw this coming a long time ago.
How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash? Download and read: Grading the graders Costly TPG ineptitude and No FG Kennedy halveshttps://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5177 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
70 Posts |
well then......fools and their money..IMHO
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10029 Posts |
I don't know the people who were bidding on this cent and drove it up until someone won it. It is hard for me to understand how anyone could pay that kind of price. But maybe if we all were in a position where money was no object, then we might do the same thing? I don't personally know. I have never been there!
But in another hobby I am deep into, glass insulators, I know a collector who can drop a million dollars and not think much of it (literally, and has). He also is into coins and has thought nothing of spending more money than I will ever see in my life just on his coin (and glass insulator hobby).
|
|
Moderator
 United States
94666 Posts |
no way I would put up that much money for such a common date. I have a hard time coming up with $1200 or so for a 1909-S VDB cent (and I need one to complete my cent collection.)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
3634 Posts |
Quote: But maybe if we all were in a position where money was no object, then we might do the same thing? @Earle42, to me there's a clear dividing line. I have a fairly decent budget for my coin and currency acquisitions, and have no problem putting out the money for a rare coin or note, but I draw the line at paying extravagant amounts for common coins because they're a "grade rarity". While I can somewhat understand the goal of building a top-registry set, paying many thousands of dollars for a coin with a mintage over 150 million, as this one has, just doesn't make sense to me. Also, the value of a common-date "grade rarity" can be an ephemeral thing. Yes, out of the 4,000 or so PCGS has graded, there is currently only 1 MS68 1938 LWC. There's no guarantee that some original bank rolls of this common date will be found to have a few more that could attain that same grade, and then the value plummets. I guess that's a chance some are willing to take. And referring to my original post, this wasn't even a MS68, but a bet was apparently being made it could possibly attain a MS68 on resubmission. That's even a bigger chance taken!
Edited by hokiefan_82 07/25/2022 9:43 pm
|
| |
Replies: 36 / Views: 3,507 |