| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,021 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
88 Posts |
Just as the title says, a 1976 Bicentennial Quarter that I'd enjoy getting some opinions on. Nothing unusual about the coin to point out and please note high res images are linked below...thanks in advance! obv>> https://ibb.co/JH9kWkbrev>> https://ibb.co/wsG402g  Edited by LazerPig 07/28/2022 8:20 pm
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll say AU-58.  to the CCF!
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
88 Posts |
Frog how are you coming to that, not upset just trying to learn as I go. I'm already suspecting my pics aren't good again b/c other than the rim nick on the rev there's not even the slightest mark anywhere else on it, nice full luster, etc ....... Thank you for the welcome btw!
Edited by LazerPig 07/28/2022 9:26 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
797 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21786 Posts |
It is normal that collector quality coins of this design that they do not show any signs of wear. MS + coins are reasonably easy to obtain. The best examples are always saved immediately from circulation, or are bought new from the Mint, or through a dealer.
In this case, the coin was not struck from fresh dies because the detail is a bit less sharp compared with a coin struck from fresh dies. That makes it harder to discern MS-58 from higher grades, with on screen pictures..
However, I will go with Coinfrog's opinion.
Edited by sel_69l 07/29/2022 06:10 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19152 Posts |
Given the images posted--some shadows and glare--I'm thinking the grade falls from high AU to low MS. Would be a solid hole filler until better comes along.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
88 Posts |
After looking at others, I recognize now that it is in fact quite a weak strike. I am still learning how that fits into the rest of the grade equation so I appreciate the explanation.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21786 Posts |
THX John 1. Your link inspired me to look at Photograde's Quarter obverses in the MS-60 to 68 range. These grades should exhibit no signs of wear, but what I was looking for was the range of sharpness of strike across this grade range
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18663 Posts |
 with AU58. looks like circulation wear on the hair framing the face as well as high point of the cheek. the coin is fairly clean of marks so it didnt see much time in circulation. lighting glare can alter the surfaces and what is being seen. in this case its difficult to assess if all the luster is there on the obverse due to the glare the 4 components of grading:  wear  strike  luster  eye appeal
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3402 Posts |
Welcome...very hard to discern from pictures...where did you pick it up? Is that a vertical die crack on the neck?
KK
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36744 Posts |
Hard to tell from these photos.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,021 |
|