| Author |
 Replies: 22 / Views: 2,632 |
|
New Member
Germany
11 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 Germany
11 Posts |
It was an unreliable grading company obviously out of business now. Which grad do you think it is for real?
|
|
Moderator
United States
34413 Posts |
@num, first welcome to CCF. Second, WCG has a decidedly negative reputation here at CCF. For one example of their issues, see this link to a prior thread. http://goccf.com/t/115198With regard to your specific coin, I'm not qualified to offer an opinion on the grade, but others will be by later today to provide their thoughts. "If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
|
|
New Member
Germany
11 Posts |
Thank you very much, I'm looking forward to the grading of the members, because I have no idea.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2281 Posts |
This isn't a 67.
How much did you pay for this coin?
If you have to ask if it's properly graded, there's a problem.
You need to educate yourself, so you don't get ripped off.
We need better photos of the surfaces.
You realize when you know how to think, it empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
Edited by NumismaticsFTW
08/03/2022 06:19 am
|
|
New Member
Germany
11 Posts |
Hello, I paid 60 dollars. Which grad would you take here?
|
|
New Member
Germany
11 Posts |
I cant take other pictures because I'm on holiday right now, but I'm fine if you guess the grade. Do you think 60 dollars was a fair price?
|
|
New Member
Germany
11 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Germany
312 Posts |
This should be in the classic US coins forum. Anyway I suspect the missing luster on large parts of Liberty's neck mean that this coin is not MS. Also the luster seems muted, so maybe the coin has been dipped. I would rate this AU-58 on the obverse. Reverse looks MS, at least MS-64, probably higher. So spoke the amateur, I am sure the experts will weigh in later. I think 60$ are ok for this coin. I would break it out of the slab though. Edited by HP2001PH
08/03/2022 07:15 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19159 Posts |
Given the images posted, I'm thinking it falls in the MS62-64 range. Evaluating the coin in-hand would be best, but that won't happen for me!
|
|
Moderator
United States
34413 Posts |
Quote:This should be in the classic US coins forum. That was my fault. It is fixed now.  "If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1273 Posts |
It is MS63+ and possibly MS64. The only grading companies I would ever rate as being accurate are in this order, most accurate first:
NGC
PCGS.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
WCG = Worst Coin Graders  to the CCF! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
Pictures have a lot of glare. My guess is MS-63 with a dip.
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1513 Posts |
MS-63 to MS-64. Lots of glare, hard to be accurate. No where near MS-67
|
| |
Replies: 22 / Views: 2,632 |
Posted 08/03/2022 04:53 am
