| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,390 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
701 Posts |
Hi! I was very disappointed, when I got this coin back from PCGS as undetermined. Is that a 'yes', 'No, or 'Maybe'..I really wanted to know at the time and that was 3 years ago. Will appreciate your input. Thanks. *** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. ***
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
701 Posts |
Another image. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
I personally don't like the look at all, but I'm sure a lot of folks would love it. It's more muted than most of the wildly bad neon AT ones on ebay. Could be natural I suppose, but I wouldn't stake a money guarantee on it, much like PCGS felt I'm sure.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5177 Posts |
Provenance is everything. OP, did you by any chance buy this coin from a seller called Mikes Mountain Values?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Russian Federation
1557 Posts |
I am very skeptical about such toning. I think chemistry worked here, but not the environment.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4395 Posts |
Are you referring to it being graded "Questionable Color"? That's just how they label artificial toning. Not exactly sure why the phrasing is so vague...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
797 Posts |
The toning is off on this coin.... I say AT.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
701 Posts |
@NumisEd...I got it from a coin shop in Temecula, CA.
And Thank you all.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
372 Posts |
I think it look's like Shake and Bake Colors , minus the shake
Just my Opinion / goldnugget
|
|
Valued Member
United States
378 Posts |
Quote: The toning is off on this coin.... I say AT. How is this determined? I have several toned ASE's, 2000 and pre 2000, quite attractive, at least to my eyes. How does one know if it's "AT"?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
It's a No. The cert number states UNC Details (91) - Questionable Color. That means artificially toned in PCGS lexicon.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187672 Posts |
Quote: How does one know if it's "AT"? You do not. Toning is either market acceptable or it is not.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
94765 Posts |
When an almost pure silver coin such as the ASE's will tone out and turn black (tarnish) not this fancy multi-colored artificial tone. Heat has to be in use here. Have you ever ground or heavily sanded a piece of metal? as it gets hot, it will turn to the colors we see on that coin above. I for 1, not a fan of this type of 'toning', no, not at all.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
 The trueview pictures look fantastic to me. But I would not pay a premium for this coin.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
378 Posts |
Quote: You do not. Toning is either market acceptable or it is not. Thank you jbuck, that's what I thought.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5197 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,390 |
|