| Author |
 Replies: 21 / Views: 1,620 |
|
Valued Member
United States
378 Posts |
Hi all, seller photos, please put a grade on it.   Thanks in advance, Eagle |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18673 Posts |
lots of glare and shadows. not 100% certain the photos are a good representation of the coin. looks like there might be some marks on thigh which could keep it from the MS65 box. at least MS64 in my mind with a shot at 65
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3402 Posts |
MS-64...higher...maybe.
KK
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree, good shot at MS-65.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Looks MS-65 to me or better . Luster looks good , strike looks good .  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
The coin looks messed with, photos may be dishonest. Can't get a feel for color, luster, hairlines, or wear on the high points.
I wouldn't pay more than AU-53 Cleaned money for it.
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
797 Posts |
Images does look off, I say 64/altered.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36770 Posts |
These look like juiced photos. I'm thinking this is a MS details coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2334 Posts |
If this seller also has slabbed coins...you have to wonder why this better date is not in a slab?
Can't tell enough from the pic's...but as other have stated...guessing it's a details coin?
smat
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Can you tell us who the seller is and what grade is he giving it  |
|
Valued Member
 United States
378 Posts |
First, thanks to all for the input!
The coin is listed as AU++, nothing stating details/cleaned. The seller has a top rating as "One of sites most reputable sellers" @ 99.9% and, also has a 30 day return policy, which is a plus. I also see some of the potential faults called out on the obverse. The reverse is what drew me to this coin, and hoping the issues showing on the obverse, are a result of bad lighting. I have nothing to lose with the return policy if it comes in details, that's if I'm lucky enough to win.
Eagle
|
|
Valued Member
United States
378 Posts |
Well, I missed out on winning this coin  Ended up going for $1070.00, oh well, got to have limits lol |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Pretty much full price for the grade.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
480 Posts |
The seller is Great Southern. Nothing against the OP, but, all of their coin photos are juiced. I'd say many of the winners don't have a clue. Here's an example. Buyer's feedback: i purchased this 1876 Indian Head penny as XF++ . The penny that I received is VF30. Auction: https://www.ebay.com/itm/295045703895 |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Jerry - Good input. Great Southern has a terrible reputation but seems to thrive as an ebay seller. Looking at your image, surprised you would pay that kind of money for such a badly scratched coin. Can you show us a pic of what you received? Edited by Coinfrog
08/18/2022 7:49 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
480 Posts |
Coinfrog, I didn't buy it. I wouldn't buy anything raw from them. Check out their inventory of Indians.
|
| |
Replies: 21 / Views: 1,620 |
Posted 08/14/2022 12:04 pm
