Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Are These Lincoln Cents Errors?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,144Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
254 Posts
 Posted 02/19/2009  1:00 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add rkp to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I found both of these coins while roll hunting. The first coin has a large gouge at 2 o'clock. The picture is not the greatest but the reasons why I think this occurred during the striking process are:

1. the "s" and "t" is still faintly present on the coin
2. the gouge is fairly deep and if it occurred during circulation, the zinc should be visible
3. the edge is thicker on one side as compared to the other (2nd picture)

The 3rd picture is of a cent with what appears to be copper bumps on the obverse. This one I'm just not sure about.

I would appreciate any comments, thanks.

Are-These-Lincoln-Cents-Errors?

Are-These-Lincoln-Cents-Errors?

Are-These-Lincoln-Cents-Errors?
Pillar of the Community
manila galleon trade's Avatar
Spain
1361 Posts
 Posted 02/19/2009  1:08 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add manila galleon trade to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Lincoln with chicken pox?
Valued Member
United States
322 Posts
 Posted 02/19/2009  2:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mikep to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hi. The 1998 look like post mint damage, but not sure. The 1984 has plating bubbles that are caused from gas trapped under the copper layer and has no extra value other than face. You will see many of these.

Mike
New Member
sparkyjim's Avatar
United States
20 Posts
 Posted 02/19/2009  2:54 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add sparkyjim to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Brain matter? sorry
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2009  1:06 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think the first one is a strike through. Anything that made that kind of an impression after striking would show as severe damage on the reverse. Something that scraped it that badly would have destroyed the copper plating.

The second one is just variation in the thickness of the edge. This one may be a bit more than normal but probably not excessive. He doesn't show the faces so it may have a misaligned die as well which often allows this to happen.

Third one is plating bubbles.
Valued Member
United States
187 Posts
 Posted 02/21/2009  10:26 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add highroller4321 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Im far from an expert but I think those all are post mint damage
Pillar of the Community
coppercoins's Avatar
United States
7629 Posts
 Posted 02/21/2009  11:16 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coppercoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
First coin in the thread is struck through something, possibly cloth. If it were damage the damage would show on the rim. The uneven thickness is common.

The second coin is caused by the mint, but isn't worth anything. It's plating imperfections where the zinc is rotting underneath the copper because of a bad wash prior to plating the zinc blank with the copper.
Valued Member
United States
254 Posts
 Posted 02/25/2009  12:38 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add rkp to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Conder101: I apologize for not labeling my pictures, but the first two pictures are of the same coin. I only wanted to show in the second picture that the edge of the coin was thicker where the metal was "removed" by the gouge. The excess metal was pushed to this side of the edge, yet the perfect smoothness and roundness of the edge was maintained implying that it occurred during striking.

If this is a stike through, does it have any value over 1 cent? Thanks!
  Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,144Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.27 seconds to rattle this change. Forums