The Re-Engraved Bowtie 1971-S LMC (Odv-028 & RDV-002, MMS-007)

http://www.varietyvista.com/01b%20L...rieties.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"> br / Sorry, silviosi. I got my pics mixed up last night when posting on two different threads but is fixed now. The closeup is of the same coin as the new pic I uploaded just now, of a 1971 D that is re-engraved. I think I have a P too but will have to do some digging. Did you refer to the VV link I gave you? It shows that there were re-engraved dies for all three mints. Scroll down to ODV-028. LINK http://www.varietyvista.com/01b%20L...arieties.htm Then scroll down to RDV-008. LINK http://www.varietyvista.com/01b%20L...arieties.htm
You would need a nice example to be able to tell if it had the RDV-008 reverse though, in my oppinion.

Comparing the die states, shows that this die that struck this coin, was polished, probably to remove a clash mark, and weakened the bow tie. That is what you are seeing on your coin.

After directly compare with VV's ODV-027,I found Makecents-ODV-028 outline structure ratio looks almost the same as VV's ODV-027.

I certainly have to say Makescents matches VV ODV-028 pretty well, even to these old peepers.
The Re-engraving is easy to see.

Here were two different ODV of the1971 LMC that I found in my coin bank. In my view the Denver's variety was VV's ODV-028 and the Phil's one was ODV-027. Am I right?

Thanks for your information! Silvio.

I want to be be clear here: Was not re-engraved Die for this year, just re-punches working Dies. Please folks, we have to stop compare years with other years. VV it is a good start to look, but them show just they see not more, this do not mean could not be others things.

this coin it is a clear re-punch Die. Some will accept , others not. By Mint docs. was re-punched Dies in order to finish the production. That's is that' all.