| Author |
 Replies: 11 / Views: 919 |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
291 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
You can post the video.
From the pics I would say AU-55, as there is some wear in the fields.
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36684 Posts |
Looks like rub on the high points, AU-58.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
557 Posts |
Lots of nicks, I'm at AU53
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5394 Posts |
Really scruffy unless it is the pix ..
EF 45. Details .
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
The pics aren't doing it any favors but it's not UNC to my eyes. I'm with wallyb at AU53.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18649 Posts |
i dont ever remember seeing a gold coin at a high AU or MS that has surfaces like this. can you get a weight on it? if its legit it looks like it was hit acid or something that altered the surfaces.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6383 Posts |
Might be ex-jewelry. Low AU detail but an excessive amount of contact marks.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1763 Posts |
I'm with @panzaldi on this. Something is not right with this one.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5663 Posts |
I'd say mid AU, possibly details. I agree the surfaces look very granular, almost like a casting. If the weight checks out, maybe genuine with impaired surfaces.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
210 Posts |
This is tough to tell, looks like the pictures may have been over sharpened? I have this coin and it doesn't show this grainy field. So I'd say mid to low AU and possibly details. Post the video, it may help.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 919 |
|
Posted 01/06/2023 8:08 pm
