If you have a slabbed coin, and you have reason to doubt it, then
the slab needs investigation, because it follows that the coin inside may not be authentic as well.
In this sort of situation, it is logical that the slab must be authenticated before any consideration is given to break the coin out.
I must admit: I have far better access to the facilities to authenticate a coin than I do for slabs, and for me, that is one of the reasons why I prefer raw coins. A coin inside a slab cannot be investigated, and thus, the slab has to be destroyed for that to happen.
There are other members here within the CCF that can provide good advice on how to authenticate slabs, and perhaps avoid having to break the coin out.
Nevertheless if you eventually prove for yourself that the slab, is, in fact genuine,
I see very little need to destroy a slab, unless you are aiming for a higher grade, with a re submission, and that should have nothing to do with the authenticity of the coin.
the slab needs investigation, because it follows that the coin inside may not be authentic as well.
In this sort of situation, it is logical that the slab must be authenticated before any consideration is given to break the coin out.
I must admit: I have far better access to the facilities to authenticate a coin than I do for slabs, and for me, that is one of the reasons why I prefer raw coins. A coin inside a slab cannot be investigated, and thus, the slab has to be destroyed for that to happen.
There are other members here within the CCF that can provide good advice on how to authenticate slabs, and perhaps avoid having to break the coin out.
Nevertheless if you eventually prove for yourself that the slab, is, in fact genuine,
I see very little need to destroy a slab, unless you are aiming for a higher grade, with a re submission, and that should have nothing to do with the authenticity of the coin.
Edited by sel_69l
02/13/2023 05:42 am
02/13/2023 05:42 am




















