Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsJoin Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

D Over S Mint Mark Not Possible So What Is This? (1983 D Cent)

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 13 / Views: 1,686Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
51 Posts
 Posted 02/18/2023  9:35 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Shorzy to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Hi CC
I know from a previous thread that the mints stopped sharing dies in the 50's but this looks like a D over an S to me. It isn't... so any idea what it might be? Thank you for any feedback

*** Edited by Staff to Add Year / Mintmark / Denomination to Title. It's very important to have in the title. ***

D-Over-S-Mint-Mark-Not-Possible-So-What-Is-This?-1983-D-Cent
Pillar of the Community
cpfull's Avatar
United States
603 Posts
 Posted 02/18/2023  9:54 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add cpfull to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I would guess it started as a small plating bubble that split or some other damage and then zinc rot set in.
Valued Member
United States
51 Posts
 Posted 02/18/2023  9:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Shorzy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
So that is what the grey color is? Zink rot? I never heard of that but I see it a lot...
Bedrock of the Community
Earle42's Avatar
United States
10038 Posts
 Posted 02/18/2023  10:57 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Earle42 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
...and it coincidentally resembles a D/S
How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash?
Download and read: Grading the graders
Costly TPG ineptitude and No FG Kennedy halves
https://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2
Pillar of the Community
kbbpll's Avatar
United States
4233 Posts
 Posted 02/18/2023  11:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add kbbpll to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Where did you get the idea that the branch mints were sharing dies? Prior to 1996 Philadelphia controlled all aspects of die making, as far as I know including punching the mint marks on working dies. It doesn't make sense that they would be exchanging dies with mint marks from another mint on them. Regardless, as said it appears to be damage that happens to look like an S.
Moderator
Learn More...
John1's Avatar
United States
56855 Posts
 Posted 02/19/2023  05:50 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
1955 is the last year for OMM's. As to die sharing, I would like to read what Mike has to say.
John1
Moderator
Learn More...
nickelsearcher's Avatar
United States
15450 Posts
 Posted 02/19/2023  06:22 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
it's simply plating damage that Pareidolia has us 'seeing' an S.
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 02/19/2023  09:37 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply


to the CCF!
Valued Member
United States
51 Posts
 Posted 02/19/2023  12:03 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Shorzy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I read a discussion thread in this forum that talked about the sharing of dies between mints. I tried to reply directly to that ongoing discussion but it was too old so I had to start a new topic...even though it was apparently an old topic. If you do a search I am sure you can find it.
Pillar of the Community
kbbpll's Avatar
United States
4233 Posts
 Posted 02/19/2023  12:41 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add kbbpll to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Is this the thread you're referring to? http://goccf.com/t/384571
If so, I think that bit about the branch mints sharing dies amongst themselves is just wrong, and I'd want to see evidence. The branch mints had no die making capabilities until Denver opened its die making shop in 1996 (source Wexler). As far as I know, they did not have any ability to anneal or harden the dies, which would have been required to repunch their own mint mark, nor to my knowledge did they have any of their own punches. Philadelphia exclusively controlled all die making, and it was tightly controlled. As you might imagine - you don't want coin dies passing around willy-nilly and getting "lost." What did happen is that some dies returned to Philadelphia (or never shipped) were reused (mint mark polished off, repunched), or mistakes with the mint marks were corrected by punching over them. If I'm wrong about any of this I'm open to factual sources to correct my understanding.
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
96553 Posts
 Posted 02/19/2023  12:44 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dearborn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Well, while it looks like a D over a rotated S, it is not. This looks more like split plating and resulting zinc blister that broke open.
Pillar of the Community
datadragon's Avatar
United States
1648 Posts
 Posted 02/19/2023  4:32 pm  Show Profile   Check datadragon's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add datadragon to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Zinc rot is like the equivalent of a zombie, dead but not as its still spendable. In 1982 when the rising cost of copper made the cent more expensive to produce than its face value, a new composition of copper-plated zinc was adopted for the cent. These cents had a core composed of 99.2% zinc and 0.8% copper, with a plating of pure copper. It is a very unstable combination. Often around the mintmark, small breaks of the plating occur as the coin is struck. That spot is a prime target area for corrosion to begin under the copper plating.

The splitting of the copper plating on post 1981 Lincoln cents usually led to an exposed zinc core which in turn formed this protective layer of zinc bloom or Hydrozincite (zinc carbonate) that you see which has formed over a split in the platting. If that coin went into circulation, the normal use would cause that protective layer to be removed and a process of reformation would begin anew. The continuous handling of the coin would have a recurrence of these events, but with an increasing size of the affected area See: https://www.error-ref.com/zinc-dete...ncoln-cents/
Edited by datadragon
02/19/2023 4:35 pm
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Cujohn's Avatar
United States
7174 Posts
 Posted 02/19/2023  8:37 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Cujohn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I will admit that with all the D over S and S over Ds we've seen, this one is the most believable. But not posable.
Valued Member
United States
51 Posts
 Posted 02/24/2023  02:07 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Shorzy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for all of the feedback!!!
  Previous TopicReplies: 13 / Views: 1,686Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.37 seconds to rattle this change. Forums