Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1972 S Proof DDO-001

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 21 / Views: 3,891Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
United States
808 Posts
 Posted 02/27/2023  4:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add allcoinsaregood to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Their is another DDO for a Proof cent, 005 but the seperation lines on the script didn't match as well as DDO-001.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
-makecents-'s Avatar
United States
8764 Posts
 Posted 02/27/2023  8:03 pm  Show Profile   Check -makecents-'s eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add -makecents- to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Is MDD Master Die Doublig?, would not all of the coins from this die exhibit the same characteristics? Defects in the master die should appear on every coin struck from it, correct? All the way down to the working die. Is this a common anomoly? Where can I reference this information?
Dowhat, scroll all the way to the bottom. It affected P, D and S coins and you will have a harder time finding one without it, than with it. There were two master dies for this year and as Wexler states, 60 to 70 percent, were from this master.

LINK https://doubleddie.com/384301.html
-makecents-
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 02/28/2023  11:00 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
50% of the cents that year had dies that had this die creation error from all three mints. Why do 50%?
1972-S-Proof-DDO-001
Note the steps of die creation:
Master Hub (only one made normally)
Master die (Only two made) So if one was doubled, 50% of the coins struck that year could have been affected.
Working Hubs if 50% of these were affected, it would pass this on down the line.
Working dies could also have 50% affected. Thus why I mentioned 50% of the coins could be affected.
Pillar of the Community
United States
808 Posts
 Posted 02/28/2023  12:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add allcoinsaregood to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
So There are 3 million plus 1972 S Proof made by a special polished Die set. The web site at Copper Coins shows listing for the s proof Lincoln Cent which I used to look at my cent. Were their two sets of Dies used to produce such a limited run? Do they use a special planchet for proofs? I guess I am trying to say is are we apples to apples here or are their apples and oranges comparison in the mix? I'm confused because I see seperation lines on the script of my cent.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Cujohn's Avatar
United States
7174 Posts
 Posted 02/28/2023  3:10 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Cujohn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Iirc proof strikes are limited to, I want to say 3000 strikes. And they are special planchets.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
-makecents-'s Avatar
United States
8764 Posts
 Posted 02/28/2023  7:08 pm  Show Profile   Check -makecents-'s eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add -makecents- to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
coop, I assumed that the 60 to 70 percent number, that Wexler mentions, is because the 2nd master, that had the doubling on it, was made and put into use in April, of that year, thus, only a third into the year, when it was introduced into production. Just going by what Wexler stated though, was not there.

It logically made sense to me though, if that was the case and the production of cents were similar, throughout the year.
-makecents-
  Previous TopicReplies: 21 / Views: 3,891Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.26 seconds to rattle this change. Forums