| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,133 |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
3039 Posts |
This one has me stumped. Is it a MD or something else ?  
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
301 Posts |
Edited by Jazzcoins 03/16/2009 09:13 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
No. It's just Machine Doubling. By 1968 the design hub had flattened out to the point that most cents had flattened out letters that touched the rim.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1807 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
 United States
3039 Posts |
Thanks Chuck. Your historical perspectives on coinage are a priceless resource.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
301 Posts |
NO The images on the coin are not flat if you look close enough there more spread out and distorted and raised Die Deterioration Doubling. Look At the pick again the image is raised on the E and there's indication of die wear on the fields You will find various stages of extra thickness on the letters due to die wear JAZEC Image: 20090316_073929.jpg67.18 KB Image: 20090316_073929.jpg20.26 KB
Edited by Jazzcoins 03/16/2009 5:58 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4541 Posts |
Nice information on that site rockdude! I bookmarked it 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
Jazzcoins - From your post above I am convinced that you wouldn't know Die Deterioration Doubling if it reached up and slapped some sense into you. This coin does NOT exhibit Die Deterioration Doubling, and I would appreciate it if you would stop contradicting people around here just to hear your brains rattle. You have no clue what you are saying, and it confuses people who don't know the difference. Why don't you leave the teaching up to the people who actually know something!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
301 Posts |
I think you better go to a recent post which you stated on a quarter that you said was Md and I said it was Die Deterioration Doubling and Mike Diamond had to correct you because you were wrong and I was right so I think it;s just the opposite. JAZEC
Edited by Jazzcoins 03/17/2009 6:46 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
I get so tired of this.
To prove Chuck's point, everyone find a nice AU or BU 1968 D or 1968 S cent.
Then find a nice 1969 D or a 1969 S cent.
Now compare the features of both.
The coins from '68 were made with badly worn master hubs that were used to make master dies that looked like mush. The resulting working hubs and working dies looked even worse.
On some coins the details of Lincoln's bust are almost non-existent and the L of LIBERTY as well as the Letters of IN GOD WE TRUST practically mesh with the rims.
The coins from 1969 are crisper and clearer as a result of new hubs being created and used.
The coin at the top of the thread is what almost any 1968 dated cent looks like. Thanks, Bill
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Here are a few doubled die obverses to look at to see what the doubled on a doubled die should look like.   Proof 1968-S 
Edited by coop 03/18/2009 01:27 am
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,133 |
|