| Author |
 Replies: 30 / Views: 3,673 |
|
New Member
United States
5 Posts |
okay I hope to be the first discovery of a 1999P rpm that's not listed.  Edited by chris617
07/29/2023 6:20 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
This must be a new one. Never see this.
Could Tan can pronounce on this?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
@Nick: In 1999 the MM was part of the Hub. But the Hub took the MM mechanically separate of the rest. Also another vision it is to be DD post http://goccf.com/t/447900 look at Bandmeister remarks. If was MD, easy to say or DDD the digits near as per example 9 will have to be affected. Is no way to have MD at this level just the MM or also DDD. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
if hubbing is resposible, that argues for "RHM" a re-hubbed mintmark
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
I agree with you on RHM, but how many know about and go out from theirs own Boll.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
95200 Posts |
never heard of a "re-hubbed mintmark" and nothing comes up at all in any google searches.
Care to explain what this is?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
Quote:
Dear wrote:
never heard of a "re-hubbed mintmark" and nothing comes up at all in any google searches.
Care to explain what this is? Yes what Nick say in fact could be translate as Re-Punch Hub Mint Mark.In fact is same as the RPM's. The difference it is one was perform on Dies and this case was perform on Working Hub. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2189 Posts |
Then there should be more than one. Hard to believe after 24 years no one has found one
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
1999 had no mint mark punch, so RPM is a misnomer, but siviosi is arguing for RHM, i.e. re-hubbing rather than MD or DDD |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
@ Nick, Yes, in fact I do not argue then to explain. Many of this period was say been MD, DDD on the MM. Then is come out that will be considerate DD's. I gone further and find out that is come from the Hub. It is simple than that. Is physically no way have such MD just on MM or DDD. Do not forgot in 1999 was the last year of the Vertical presses. In 1999 the MM was punch on Hub and was the last year before the CNC took the work. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3237 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
In the US, mint mark punching refers to the process by which a physical mint mark punch is struck (punched) by hand. Thar was not the way US mint marks were applied in 1999. That process, the one by which RPMs were sometimes made, had ended several years earlier. The 1999 hubbing process did not include a mint mark being punched by hand. If it did, we would see mint mark locations vary from coin to coin like they did decades before 1999.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
Sorry Nick, you open two topics. After 1989 the MM was punch mechanically and not by hand. I have maybe one of last saw RPM from 1989 but in Quarter.
How worked?: the hub was align and then the press punch the MM. And this procedures was applied as is need.
I give away all my Nickels to analyze better and see the orientation. Maybe Bandmaster have some samples to see the original orientation.
Me I analyze each coin by the year of production. I am from the old balloon of varieties, but the technology change, so I has to go out from that balloon..
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73849 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
Someone or somebody who say MD or DDD can show me an example of what him/ her say? Go ahead guys show me. Show as big as this an only one digit or letter. Good Luck to find. Edited by silviosi
07/29/2023 10:00 pm
|
| |
Replies: 30 / Views: 3,673 |
Posted 07/29/2023 6:19 pm
