Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1887 Three-Cent Nickel PCGS OGH: Controversial (For The 20 People In The World Who Care)

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 10 / Views: 989Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
pristine2's Avatar
United States
1048 Posts
 Posted 09/16/2023  7:47 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add pristine2 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I never understood why these odd, lovely little coins weren't more popular among collectors. They're still way under-valued relative to their mintage.

My LCS guy is convinced that PCGS (now) mis-describes these coins. I'm not persuaded.

What say you? Grade and variety pls.


1887-Three-Cent-Nickel-PCGS-OGH:-Controversial-For-The-20-People-In-The-World-Who-Care
1887-Three-Cent-Nickel-PCGS-OGH:-Controversial-For-The-20-People-In-The-World-Who-Care
Edited by pristine2
09/17/2023 6:19 pm
Valued Member
United States
202 Posts
 Posted 09/16/2023  9:56 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add apcol258 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
PR 63

Edit to add variety: This is the weak overdate
Edited by apcol258
09/17/2023 08:22 am
Pillar of the Community
jacrispies's Avatar
United States
3848 Posts
 Posted 09/17/2023  02:04 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jacrispies to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
PR 63 first thought although difficult to grade through the slab.
Suffering from bust half fever.
Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955
Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves.
Moderator
Learn More...
John1's Avatar
United States
56855 Posts
 Posted 09/17/2023  09:23 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Ha,I'm getting better at grading because I said to myself PR63 before reading the other comments.
John1
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
panzaldi's Avatar
United States
18644 Posts
 Posted 09/17/2023  11:13 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add panzaldi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
PR62 maybe 63. tough to call that obv
Pillar of the Community
jacrispies's Avatar
United States
3848 Posts
 Posted 09/17/2023  11:48 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jacrispies to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Ha,I'm getting better at grading because I said to myself PR63 before reading the other comments.
John1


Not so fast... he will post the grade and it will be in an MS-67 holder
Suffering from bust half fever.
Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955
Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves.
Pillar of the Community
pristine2's Avatar
United States
1048 Posts
 Posted 09/17/2023  12:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add pristine2 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It's not the grade that's controversial here, but the date (hint).
Pillar of the Community
pristine2's Avatar
United States
1048 Posts
 Posted 09/17/2023  3:43 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add pristine2 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
OK, the controversy:

Here's what NGC says about the 1887 three-cent nickel proof: "The non-overdated variety forms a minority of the 1887 three-cent proofs. Walter Breen noted that these were the first examples coined, as they were formerly found among the complete proof sets of that year, nearly all of which have since been broken up into certified singles. This issue is also notably more rare than the overdate, though the popularity of the latter has nearly evened-out their values. Gems are very scarce, cameo pieces almost non-collectable."

Here's what PCGS (which graded this coin) says about the 1887 three-cent nickel proof: "Apparently, all of the 1887 Three Cent Nickel dies were overdated from 1886. It is possible that dies dated 1886 were left over from production in 1886 then reused, but it could be possible that the engraver of the Proof dies started making the 1887 Proof dies with a simple mistake. Since the dies for each year's production were made at the end of the previous year, it is natural that the engraver could forget that he was producing dies for 1887 in 1886, and simply grab the old 1886 date punch. This appears to be the case for the multiple dies used to produce Proof Three-Cent Nickels for 1887. Once the mistake was realized, some effort was made to efface the error by grinding (or polishing) the dies, but based on the evidence of the coins themselves, this appears to be a hit-and-miss effort. What we have today are two different varieties known as the Strong Overdate and the Weak Overdate. True to their names, the Weak Overdate has barely visible remnants of an underlying 6 and the Strong Overdate has a rather sharp 6 underneath the 7. Collectors value these varieties differently and the Strong Overdate usually commands a premium over the Weak Overdate variety."

My LCS guy: "NGC is right. PCGS is full of horse hooey (he used a similar term). PCGS used to grade three varieties -- as you can see with this OGH holder -- now it only does two, but that's only to justify their pie & the sky theory. There's no hint of any overdate on this coin."
Edited by pristine2
09/17/2023 3:44 pm
Valued Member
United States
202 Posts
 Posted 09/17/2023  4:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add apcol258 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Your LCS guy seems to be following the assumption that old ways of thinking are not subject to change. PCGS has it correct here in their comments. There are other die markers present on the weak overdate coins. Looking at those other markers, this coin is clearly from the same obverse die as other weak overdate coins. The overdate has however been largely polished away in this example. This practice by the mint is also pointed out in the PCGS comments.
Pillar of the Community
pristine2's Avatar
United States
1048 Posts
 Posted 09/17/2023  6:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add pristine2 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
There are other die markers present on the weak overdate coins.


There's no question my LCS is guy is, in fact, a crotchety old fart. There's a Nixon/Agnew campaign poster on the wall of his shop, enshrined with 50-year-old plastic flowers.

But can you elaborate please? I don't have an opinion yet ... and the NGC explanation seems equally plausible.
Pillar of the Community
pristine2's Avatar
United States
1048 Posts
 Posted 09/17/2023  6:21 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add pristine2 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

1887-Three-Cent-Nickel-PCGS-OGH:-Controversial-For-The-20-People-In-The-World-Who-Care
  Previous TopicReplies: 10 / Views: 989Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.29 seconds to rattle this change. Forums