| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 989 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1048 Posts |
I never understood why these odd, lovely little coins weren't more popular among collectors. They're still way under-valued relative to their mintage. My LCS guy is convinced that PCGS (now) mis-describes these coins. I'm not persuaded. What say you? Grade and variety pls.   Edited by pristine2 09/17/2023 6:19 pm
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
202 Posts |
PR 63
Edit to add variety: This is the weak overdate
Edited by apcol258 09/17/2023 08:22 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
PR 63 first thought although difficult to grade through the slab.
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Ha,I'm getting better at grading because I said to myself PR63 before reading the other comments. John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18644 Posts |
PR62 maybe 63. tough to call that obv
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
Quote: Ha,I'm getting better at grading because I said to myself PR63 before reading the other comments. John1
Not so fast... he will post the grade and it will be in an MS-67 holder 
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1048 Posts |
It's not the grade that's controversial here, but the date (hint).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1048 Posts |
OK, the controversy: Here's what NGC says about the 1887 three-cent nickel proof: "The non-overdated variety forms a minority of the 1887 three-cent proofs. Walter Breen noted that these were the first examples coined, as they were formerly found among the complete proof sets of that year, nearly all of which have since been broken up into certified singles. This issue is also notably more rare than the overdate, though the popularity of the latter has nearly evened-out their values. Gems are very scarce, cameo pieces almost non-collectable." Here's what PCGS (which graded this coin) says about the 1887 three-cent nickel proof: "Apparently, all of the 1887 Three Cent Nickel dies were overdated from 1886. It is possible that dies dated 1886 were left over from production in 1886 then reused, but it could be possible that the engraver of the Proof dies started making the 1887 Proof dies with a simple mistake. Since the dies for each year's production were made at the end of the previous year, it is natural that the engraver could forget that he was producing dies for 1887 in 1886, and simply grab the old 1886 date punch. This appears to be the case for the multiple dies used to produce Proof Three-Cent Nickels for 1887. Once the mistake was realized, some effort was made to efface the error by grinding (or polishing) the dies, but based on the evidence of the coins themselves, this appears to be a hit-and-miss effort. What we have today are two different varieties known as the Strong Overdate and the Weak Overdate. True to their names, the Weak Overdate has barely visible remnants of an underlying 6 and the Strong Overdate has a rather sharp 6 underneath the 7. Collectors value these varieties differently and the Strong Overdate usually commands a premium over the Weak Overdate variety." My LCS guy: "NGC is right. PCGS is full of horse hooey (he used a similar term). PCGS used to grade three varieties -- as you can see with this OGH holder -- now it only does two, but that's only to justify their pie & the sky theory. There's no hint of any overdate on this coin."
Edited by pristine2 09/17/2023 3:44 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
202 Posts |
Your LCS guy seems to be following the assumption that old ways of thinking are not subject to change. PCGS has it correct here in their comments. There are other die markers present on the weak overdate coins. Looking at those other markers, this coin is clearly from the same obverse die as other weak overdate coins. The overdate has however been largely polished away in this example. This practice by the mint is also pointed out in the PCGS comments.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1048 Posts |
Quote: There are other die markers present on the weak overdate coins. There's no question my LCS is guy is, in fact, a crotchety old fart. There's a Nixon/Agnew campaign poster on the wall of his shop, enshrined with 50-year-old plastic flowers. But can you elaborate please? I don't have an opinion yet ... and the NGC explanation seems equally plausible.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1048 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 989 |
|