| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 2,733 |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
94786 Posts |
What to you all make of this one? The edge lettering is: HUNDRED CENTS ONE DOLLAR OR UNIT with other symbols between the words. Forgot to add: weight of 26.68 grams and a diameter of 39.4mm  
Edited by Dearborn 10/18/2023 08:49 am
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5661 Posts |
Looks like a fake based on the date alone.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
94786 Posts |
Could be, I think it's a fake because the bust is too far left of center too.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
Reverse is a very crude copy of a 1796 BB-61 SD/LL
Obverse is a fantasy.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5661 Posts |
The obverse bust position is similar to the 1795 off-center bust, definitely not a 1796 obverse.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
(sarcasm!) Just list it on ebay as a newly-discovered unique transitional pattern or "mule" combining a 1796-dated 1795 obverse with a 1796 Large Letters reverse. Make sure to mention that it comes with a signed COA from renowned German numismatist U(we) R(ainer) Skrüde, better known by his first initials U.R, who estimates that when professionally certified by B.S.C.S. it will grade out at around MS63.348 on the Plinkenbinnen scale.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
Edited by paralyse 10/17/2023 6:35 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
The vampire's fangs were freshly sharpened on that one!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Super fake looking. Honestly I'd never buy one of these out of a slab even if the details were perfect.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
Look at the star closest to the date (Left Side) it is completely in the wrong position compared to the hair curls. Looks like they copied the stars off of a 1795. Here is a photo from Martin Logies "Early Dollars-A pocket guide to Major Varieties" to compare them (Small and Large date) too:  I call FAKE. paralyse - 
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2˘ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440
Edited by westcoin 10/17/2023 7:22 pm
|
|
Moderator
  United States
94786 Posts |
Yup, I knew it was a fake, I didn't buy it. I don't remember where I got ahold of this one, the images of this I keep in my 'Fake and Counterfeit' directory. I just re-found this when I was going through my 1962 world coins to compile a list for my collection so I don't 'dearborn' any and wind up with duplicates.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
517 Posts |
As kbbpll stated, the vampire variety of of-center bust dollars; I wrote a Coin Week article on this "family" of fakes!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73688 Posts |
That's a pretty bad looking fake.
Errers and Varietys.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 2,733 |
|