Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1902 IHC New Pics...care To Try Again ?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 10 / Views: 1,277Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
InfiniteInterest's Avatar
United States
673 Posts
 Posted 04/04/2009  11:17 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add InfiniteInterest to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
While working at the shop a couple weeks ago, Ed showed me a few coins he had set aside for different reasons, this one was apparent right away. There is no lettering on the Obverse of this coin, only the Indian and the date. As far as I can tell, there are no marks whatsoever to indicate the removal of the letters and no indication they were ever there.I don't see any evidence of a strike through either, however unlikely that might be. I have never seen anything like this, maybe someone here has.
Any and all thoughts on this coin are appreciated.


EDIT:

O.K. Fresh pics tonight.

Coin weighs in at 3.0g. I also weighed several other circulated IHC's and they all weighed 3.0g or less, except one that was XF/AU came in at 3.1g.
I can not really see any areas that would indicate some kind of tooling or abrasion.I am not sure you could remove that much metal and still get a 3.0g weight on this coin, the AG coins I weighed were 2.7g and 2.8g
The damaged area on the right lower obverse is a bit suspicious, but the rim is also damaged right about 5 o'clock in that area, Makes me think it is just that- a damaged area- unintentional. I could be wrong...that's why I am here

Thanks for looking again ! This really is the fun part of collecting ! ....IMO Damaged or not...I have never seen one quite like this !




Coop, I am not really seeing any weakness in the feathers, at least no more than a G-4 IHC would have ? I do see some flow lines/polish lines near most of the feathers though. Not sure which they might be.

In the full obv pic you can just see the rim damage near the bottom right, sorry the scope has a limited field even at lowest mag. The rest of the pics follow the clock starting at 9o'clock.



1902-IHC-New-Pics...care-To-Try-Again-?

9 O'clock




1902-IHC-New-Pics...care-To-Try-Again-?

10 O'clock



1902-IHC-New-Pics...care-To-Try-Again-?

11 O'clock



1902-IHC-New-Pics...care-To-Try-Again-?

12 O'clock



1902-IHC-New-Pics...care-To-Try-Again-?

1 O'clock



1902-IHC-New-Pics...care-To-Try-Again-?

2 O'clock



1902-IHC-New-Pics...care-To-Try-Again-?

3 O'clock




1902-IHC-New-Pics...care-To-Try-Again-?

This is the 4-5 O'clock area with the damage, the rim damage is in the bottom left corner.



1902-IHC-New-Pics...care-To-Try-Again-?
Edited by InfiniteInterest
04/09/2009 9:23 pm
Valued Member
jayceeg's Avatar
United States
114 Posts
 Posted 04/04/2009  11:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jayceeg to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Very interesting. I'll be following this thread to see what people think. I have no clue
Rest in Peace
numismo's Avatar
United States
3039 Posts
 Posted 04/05/2009  02:16 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add numismo to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Might be that the letters were removed and then the coin subjected to artificial wearing to smooth out the surface.
Pillar of the Community
copper nickel daddy's Avatar
United States
2224 Posts
 Posted 04/05/2009  05:25 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add copper nickel daddy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Could be an extreme case of a grease-filled obverse die. Happens frequently to Lincolns.
Valued Member
Jim Archibald's Avatar
United States
198 Posts
 Posted 04/05/2009  08:41 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jim Archibald to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hi guys, question, have you weighed this coin? If the lettering was removed, it'll be underweight. If it's a filled die, it will be full weight. The head seems worn but correct, so I don't think it's a mule with a CWT obverse. ~ Jim
Moderator
Learn More...
vermontensium's Avatar
United States
16679 Posts
 Posted 04/05/2009  10:59 am  Show Profile   Check vermontensium's eBay Listings Check vermontensium's eCrater Listings Bookmark this reply Add vermontensium to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Could be an extreme case of a grease-filled obverse die.

IMO, I doubt that. All the conditions would have had to be perfect to have this happen. I believe the coin has been altered by someone with tons of time on their hands. Again, just my opinion. Would love to hear others opinions.
swcoin.ecrater.com
Pillar of the Community
InfiniteInterest's Avatar
United States
673 Posts
 Posted 04/05/2009  11:08 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add InfiniteInterest to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I must have had a brain fart since I did not even think to weigh this coin....I will be doing so the next time I work at the shop (If I remember) I will post weight results and any other things I can find out about it Wed night after work. Thanks for your opinions.

EDIT:

I probably should have posted this under the error and variety forum..sorry bout that- it has been awhile ! If any Mod would like to move this to the E and V forum, I would appreciate it.

Edited by InfiniteInterest
04/05/2009 11:21 am
Bedrock of the Community
DVCollector's Avatar
United States
10045 Posts
 Posted 04/05/2009  2:26 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DVCollector to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
IMO, I doubt that. All the conditions would have had to be perfect to have this happen.


There should be a trace of the devices, because it's not like dirt has the same density as die fields, and could be completely flush under intense pressure--planchet metal would push into these areas, ever so slightly. Granted, the coin is worn down to VG, but it shouldn't wear off all traces. I would put this under a scope and look for struck surfaces in the devices. If that's missing or there's minute tooling marks that might confirm a post-mint job. By Snow's attribution guides, there isn't a record of a 1902 IHC missing the obverse legends.
Pillar of the Community
foundinrolls's Avatar
United States
3507 Posts
 Posted 04/06/2009  12:35 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add foundinrolls to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I also think the coin was altered. The odds of a Grease Filled Die effecting all the lettering and leaving the date alone is fairly slim. I say that because any grease or debris that thick toward the edge of the coin would have to effect the date area.

Many Indian cents were machined for various reasons.

Thanks,
Bill
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 04/09/2009  6:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The tips of the feathers being weak is an indication that something was done with this coin. There were careful no to disturb the rim, but tampered with it.
Pillar of the Community
foundinrolls's Avatar
United States
3507 Posts
 Posted 04/10/2009  12:00 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add foundinrolls to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Actually the closeups show a great deal of evidence of tooling of some kind. The one that strikes me most is the one with the Indian's feathers and all the deep scratches.

The difference in color of the toned metal in the area where the letters used to be indicates that the metal was removed and the coin retoned as it aged.

It also does not show the signs of having been Struck Through Grease. The first two points made in this point though clinch it for me. The coin was definitely tampered with in some way.

Thanks,
Bill
  Previous TopicReplies: 10 / Views: 1,277Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.3 seconds to rattle this change. Forums