| Author |
 Replies: 14 / Views: 640 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
984 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1034 Posts |
Did you check Variety Vista, Wexler or Coppercoin sites yet?
It looks like it has an RPM.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1034 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1034 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8750 Posts |
It's die chipping that has been smoothed over. I had this explained to me several years ago, was common on large and small dates.  -makecents-
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8750 Posts |
Here are more pics I already had uploaded on this site. More chipping.  -makecents-
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74189 Posts |
Not seeing a DDO. You might have a minor RPM though. Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96071 Posts |
a Small RPM and not seeing a DDO here. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10540 Posts |
Quote:
1960-D Small Date Lincoln Just to clarify: Your cent is a Large Date variety. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8750 Posts |
Quote:
Just to clarify: Your cent is a Large Date variety. The OP's example is a small date, as stated. Marve65 if you are referring to my examples, yes, they are large dates. The die chipping I described was present on both small and large dates though. -makecents-
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree the first coin is clearly a small date. Overall, I don't see a whole lot going on here.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
984 Posts |
I guess I was referring to the the zero in the date as much as anything. There is layering on the inside and outside and the numbers and letters of liberty are thicker than usual. It's from an original roll and most of the coins have full memorial steps making me think it's a newer die. My first thought was MD. I know other members have seen these . It's the reason I posted
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8750 Posts |
Here you go, gros. One of the many changes from small to large date was to try and eliminate the "chipping" issue they were having on the date, but as you can see on both your and my example, it did not work. They thought by changing the size and thinning the date on the large date, it would help but it did not. What you are seeing, as I have already stated, is due to chipping. LINK https://www.error-ref.com/change_fr...te_on_the_l/ -makecents-
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10540 Posts |
Quote:
The OP's example is a small date, as stated. Marve65 if you are referring to my examples, yes, they are large dates. OH Jeez, sorry, my mistake - I somehow got those pictures mixed up! Thanks for straightening me out. Nevermind -  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
984 Posts |
Quote:
Here you go, gros. One of the many changes from small to large date was to try and eliminate the "chipping" issue they were having on the date, but as you can see on both your and my example, it did not work. They thought by changing the size and thinning the date on the large date, it would help but it did not. What you are seeing, as I have already stated, is due to chipping.
Finally that registered, thanks so much |
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 640 |
|
Posted 03/19/2024 8:42 pm
