| Author |
Replies: 27 / Views: 1,522 |
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96857 Posts |
Quote: They wouldn't polish the die enough to remove the date and still use it. Looks like it's been sanded off. I thought of that too, but how do you explain the field rising up to the level of the rim? This ain't no Cud.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8775 Posts |
John1, I think this would be a good one for Mike Diamond, if you could bring him into the mix. I liked your tapered planchet to begin with, but all the examples I have seen have the same thin rim on the opposing side and this one does not.
-makecents-
|
|
New Member
 United States
36 Posts |
If you look northwest above liberty, you can see an abstract distortion that is slightly smaller than the same distortion in the area where the date is supposed to be. If you look closely, the distortion in both areas look like a circle that exploded. Why would someone sand in the open space above liberty and do the same thing where the date is supposed to be? I have no idea what is going on with the date. I just know this coin sat in a box for at least 31 years and am unsure how long before that. My Father in-law found this coin in pocket change, along with a box full of misc. coins and about 1000 wheat cents thru the years. He was not a collector. Both he and his wife would save any wheat pennies and odd coins they found. I received these coins yesterday. So, I do not know when this could have occurred, but it had to be before 1992. (reference for age without date?) I am certain they did not sand this coin. Should I get it graded? I have a bunch more coins from the box I will post. I am going thru 42-1955 Lincon's (9 D's, 2 S's, 31 NMM) that were in the box and will post anything interesting. Thank you all for your expertise, time and patience. Respectfully,
Edited by AtlanticBo 05/31/2024 11:45 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Just PMed Mike  John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2738 Posts |
The fine parallel striations and the reduced height of the design rim to the right of the missing date indicate that both the date and design rim were abraded away outside the Mint.
Error coin writer and researcher.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96857 Posts |
Thanks Mike - (I guess that blows my theory out of the water  )
|
|
New Member
 United States
36 Posts |
Mike,
First, thank you and everyone for your input.
Would there be signs of the date under magnification, when a coin is abraded?
Respectfully,
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8775 Posts |
Thank you, Mike, for your input. Just odd about the weight and the edge of the coin looks normal thickness from the pics given.
-makecents-
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96857 Posts |
exactly Jon, that what I was thinking too.. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1265 Posts |
I see some "tooling" marks in that entire area. Running basically from East to West. Just my opinion.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
Quote: the field rising up to the level of the rim? The fields don't rise up to meet the rim. The rim is sanded down to the level of the fields.
|
| |
Replies: 27 / Views: 1,522 |