| Author |
 Replies: 55 / Views: 5,206 |
|
Pillar of the Community
Sweden
1812 Posts |
*** Edited by Staff to Add Year / Mintmark / Denomination to Title. It's very important to have in the title. ***Well gave this bugger a 3 hour soak after breaking it out of the holder. Not graded by a reputable 3gp. It had a haze I didnt know if it was toning or from holder Idk if there is any visible change? I think I need E-zest in my life.... I will now let it soak for longer. Poor Jack First before pics   After  
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19106 Posts |
You might have better results after a four+ day soak. It's worked for me on clad haze about 70% of the time.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187446 Posts |
Whatever it is, it may be an irreversible reaction with the metal. If a longer acetone soak does not work, I would call it quits. e-Z-est does not play nice with clad coins and I think trying it would make it look worse.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3535 Posts |
Yeah I agree about the haze on coins being difficult to correct. I would try a longer soak as suggested, can't hurt to try.
Good practice as well.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Sweden
1812 Posts |
Yes I will now try atleast 24hour. Will post my result for you or lack of Get that cam free. Ezest and ms70 is not sold in europe  I have heard that ms70 works on haze and is not as strong as ez  Edited by Moniker
07/31/2024 11:58 am
|
|
Moderator
United States
94574 Posts |
a filled MM - cannot see it very clearly is it a type 1 or 2?
|
|
Moderator
United States
56855 Posts |
Keep in mind that ezest is a cleaner and acetone is a conserver. John1  |
|
Pillar of the Community
Sweden
1812 Posts |
Now that you say it dearborn the S-mark looks a bit strange. Posted this in general first as it says one can discuss cleaning and preservation there. Is that a variation or error ? The last pics shows Jack in acetone Quote:
Keep in mind that ezest is a cleaner and acetone is a conserver.
John1 Yes true that, would like to try ms70 on a hazy cheap coin like this just to see what I does Edited by Moniker
07/31/2024 4:16 pm
|
|
Moderator
United States
187446 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Not seeing any improvement. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Sweden
1812 Posts |
A type 1 then. Had no clue different mm was used. But I don't collect these. Thank you for the edjucation John1  You just wait CF! Miracles do happen! Edited by Moniker
07/31/2024 4:24 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
196 Posts |
Good job cleaning a Au proof coin and making it an Au details proof coin (dont clean coins)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7174 Posts |
Quote:
Good job cleaning Acetone is an accepted form of conserving. But it didn't help in this case. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Sweden
1812 Posts |
Au? I say XF! its not a valuable coin and acetone is conserving
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19930 Posts |
Acetone and other organic solvents will do nothing to that haze. I've tried 'em all and then some.
I don't collect or pay much attention to anything except Lincolns but I've heard MS70 can be effective on proof haze. If you go all out with EZest, be VERY careful. I have seen people ruin clad coins with it and proofs are very sensitive.....especially clad proofs.
The bigger question, why bother unless it has sentimental value to you? I think these are probably like $5-10 coins? Easier to sell it and buy a replacement.
Lincoln Cent Lover!VERDI-CARE™ INVENTOR https://verdi.care/
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Sweden
1812 Posts |
I find it interesting to see how the coin is responding, and better to find out on a cheap coin than ruining a nice one. Acetone has improved some other of my coins.
Ezest seems a bit strong, if I decide to try out more ways on this coin it will be ms70. But first I will await the 24hour trial.
|
| |
Replies: 55 / Views: 5,206 |
Posted 07/31/2024 09:48 am
