Author |
Replies: 40 / Views: 3,200 |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10922 Posts |
The edge lettering process likely caused this, not PMD. View PCGS's plate coin for a MS60 Capped Half below, it's similar. A die is used to apply the lettering. It leaves an "upset" appearing rim. When the piece was struck there was not enough outward metal flow and/or die pressure to "flatten" the blank. Lettering is applied prior to striking, open collar striking usually removed most of the upset rim. In this case it didn't. If interested Google "castaing machine" and/or view this link. https://coinweek.com/edge-collars-c...d-dimension/ 
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3703 Posts |
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: https://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves.
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3703 Posts |
@BH1964 Although your process of thinking is correct, that is simply not how bust halves will look in the striking process. Here is why... The Castaing machine does indeed upset the rim, but no sharp edges are created. Any blank planchet will show a round and natural curvature of the edge rather than a sharp Rim Fin. Although we do not have a CBH blank planchet, here is an off center that perfectly demonstrates the effect of the Castaing machine pre-strike.   Additionally, to prove that the striking process does not somehow create a Rim Fin, here is an 1817 O-103 in which the die marriage produced examples with significant planchet expansion that went outside of the die's reach. Note the planchet metal is squeezed out through the dentils and no Rim Fin is produced.  Lastly, to show the " Rim Fin" defect has no correlation with the Castaing edge lettering machine, take a look at 11:30-1:00 O'Clock on the reverse of the OP coin. There is notable rim flatness (dentils missing/oval shaped planchet), which is sign of a Guido. A Guido is an unlettered portion of the edge which does not upset the rim, which as a result creates a weak spot on the rim. But, there is both Guido flatness and a sharp rim. 
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: https://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves.
Edited by jacrispies 01/17/2025 11:32 am
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10922 Posts |
Correct, an open collar striking does not create rim finning. Nevertheless some open collar strikes exhibit what we today would might call rim finning. This is due to the edge lettering process. There are many examples to be found, although it is not a normal occurrence.
Each time I've seen what was thought to be rim damage on a straight graded bust half, it was due to the edge lettering process. A process the U.S. mint experienced many difficulties with in the early 1800s. The 1818 PCGS MS60 plate coin exhibits the same issue from 6:00 to 11:00.
Edited by BH1964 01/17/2025 11:48 am
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3703 Posts |
Quote: Nevertheless some open collar strikes exhibit what we today would might call rim finning. This is due to the edge lettering process. There are many examples to be found I've provided evidence to prove this incorrect, but if you can, post some more photos or evidence to back up your claim. I am open and curious to see what you are referencing to. The single 1818 PCGS photo is too difficult to examine, especially with the photo editing around the edge and the high reflectivity.
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: https://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves.
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10922 Posts |
I'd be happy to. Let me look around the web this weekend. Many times I thought bust halves had rim damage and each time it was due to the edge lettering process.
Not saying that's the case here. It is possible PCGS graders completely missed what would be clear damage when holding the raw coin by the rims during grading. When I view the images of the OPs coin there is nothing that appears to be damage.
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
528 Posts |
Since the subject has turned to education and the CBH edge lettering process, would one of you also comment on why some edge lettering on CBH tends to bleed over the edge creating what looks like rim dings when it is clearly due to some combination of either the lettering process, die state, strike and/or maybe planchet issues? And is there a term used to describe this? Thx, Adam
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
948 Posts |
Very interesting comments, all. I appreciate the opportunity to learn something new. 
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3703 Posts |
Quote: Since the subject has turned to education and the CBH edge lettering process, would one of you also comment on why some edge lettering on CBH tends to bleed over the edge creating what looks like rim dings when it is clearly due to some combination of either the lettering process, die state, strike and/or maybe planchet issues? And is there a term used to describe this? Thx, Adam The overlapping of the edge lettering is most commonly seen on the earlier dates of the 1810s. Back then, the diameter of the coins were slightly larger (compared to 1830s), spreading the planchet and decreasing the thickness. Due to this, there was not much tolerance to have the edge lettering perfectly centered, and part of the edge lettering bleeded over the edge. When the coin is struck, there are unfilled portions that can appear as rim damage but are actually mint made which can be confirmed by the lack of displaced metal. The edge lettering was placed on by bar dies which are replaced every 3-5 die marriages on average. Perhaps the letters were larger on some bar dies, or maybe the planchet stock was rolled thinner than normal. The Castaing machine could have been set up in a way that the edge lettering was slightly off center. Not only are there equipment system faults, but there could also be worker handling errors that could produce mistakes on a single coin if it was not hand loaded into the machine properly. I've seen PCGS detail a coin for rim damage despite it being clearly an edge lettering issue. The coin was returned to PCGS and it came back bent. It wasn't bent either, that is how that die marriage naturally appears. You can't always win with the grading games. Either way if you see a detailed or marked "damaged" coin for this minor edge lettering mistake, grab it for the discount! Here is the best image I have on file, with the characteristics noted at 3, 6, and 9 O'Clock along the rim. This is not the most dramatic example I have seen, but it does show what we are looking for. 
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: https://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves.
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
528 Posts |
Jacrispies, thanks for the info. I kind of figured it might be a combination of things. Coincidentally, the CBH is was looking at most recently with the issue was also an 1812 which I picked up a couple of weekends ago. Also, not knowing what the Castaing machine was, I did a little research and also found a nice 30 second video on YT of a reproduction Castaing machine in action, apparently made by folks at the ANA. Seeing that video was a great help in understanding the basic technology of the time used to impress lettering into the edges of a coin.
|
|
Replies: 40 / Views: 3,200 |