| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 1,681 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
878 Posts |
I put this together for my son, a little something for his wall. After completing it, I wasn't sure that I liked all of the duplicates such as 4 Kennedy HD. So figured out what else would fit and ended up with the 2nd version, a little more history and variety.   |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10492 Posts |
Both are great but I like the 2nd having more varieties of coins - to me one Kennedy and one Eisenhower (sorry jbuck) is enough to look at!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
25030 Posts |
Yes, both are fantastic and look great! I also prefer the second as it is a better representation of US coins. By the way, I figured out that your set holder was not made after 1978 - no hole for a SBA dollar. Inordinately fascinated by bits of metal with strange markings and figures
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
824 Posts |
I like the second one better, more of a variety. You just need to rename the holder.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
878 Posts |
Thx for the feedback, Marv, Hondo and Bud. Hondo, good point, I didn't think about when the SBA fist came out. So pre-79 it is. For the most part, I filled this up with what I had on hand with the exception of the Barber half, quarter and the Liberty nickel. I'll be keeping an eye out for a few specific upgrades. I'd like a better Flying Eagle cent, Shield nickel, CBQ and maybe CBH. I have a better CBH, just not sure I want to give it up. I'm also contemplating carefully adding two holes at the bottom for a large cent and a 1/2 cent. Edited by adam126402
02/02/2025 5:32 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10492 Posts |
Quote:
I'm also contemplating carefully adding two holes at the bottom for a large cent and a 1/2 cent.  Good idea! |
|
Valued Member
United States
450 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
United States
187862 Posts |
Both look good, but the second is indeed more fun! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2023 Posts |
I prefer the first one because some coins don't match the labels and aren't from the 20th century in the first place. I'd show the reverse for the bicentennial issues and other "duplicates" (like you did the steel cent) and leave it at that.
|
|
Moderator
United States
187862 Posts |
Labels can be changed with some effort.  But all opinions are welcome.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1888 Posts |
In v.2, why is there an 1860s Shield nickel where a 1938 Jefferson should be? |
|
Moderator
United States
187862 Posts |
Same reason why other coins are in holes that do not match the labels. Quote:
So figured out what else would fit and ended up with the 2nd version, a little more history and variety. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2609 Posts |
Quote:
I prefer the first one because some coins don't match the labels and aren't from the 20th century in the first place. I'd show the reverse for the bicentennial issues and other "duplicates" (like you did the steel cent) and leave it at that.  This. The first one looks more cohesive. I understand your motivation behind the second one, but it looks anachronistic, with a Capped Bust half next to an Eisenhower dollar, a Shield nickel next to a Bicentennial quarter, and a Nickel Three Cent Piece next to a Roosevelt dime. |
|
Moderator
United States
95200 Posts |
yeah, the 2nd set is much better.. but they both look great..
|
|
Valued Member
United States
216 Posts |
PLEASE, turn the Bicentennial coins around so the reverses show!!!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2461 Posts |
nice! both have their merits! that had to be a very satisfying accomplishment. some nice looking coins in those, well done! color me jealous instead of pink!  |
| |
Replies: 18 / Views: 1,681 |
Posted 02/02/2025 02:01 am
