| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 1,983 |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5672 Posts |
Another recent submission to PCGS. Asking for your thoughts on the grade, and I'll post the PCGS result in a couple days.  
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74279 Posts |
I'll guess MS-63.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2852 Posts |
I'll agree w/ MS63, nice looking CC. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188724 Posts |
Lovely example! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1513 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
MS-63 with a possible (*) for outstanding eye appeal.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1527 Posts |
I'll venture an MS-62 due to cheek and neck chatter.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
MS-64 I think PCGS grades GSA morgans light.
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
620 Posts |
I agree MS 63, possible 64.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
450 Posts |
Nice One Zurie. I think she may make 64 in spite of the obverse chatter and cheek rub.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10547 Posts |
I'll stay at 63 although 64 will not surprise
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
The reverse crescent toning is quite attractive. The obverse contact marks seem to be light and superficial. I think it would go MS64 without a problem. I would be a bit disappointed if it came back MS63.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
599 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1298 Posts |
Using these photos I don't see anything major on the cheek and neck. Several light scratches. I believe it grades MS64.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
747 Posts |
62/63, screams quick dip to remove the ugly tone.
Edited by NDBirdman 02/28/2025 1:27 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Quote: 62/63, screams quick dip to remove the ugly tone. If you want a bright, shiny coin without originality? That's the thing to do. It would all but guarantee a lower grade like 62 or 63. 63 with a quick dip and 62 with a long dip. Many people have done this over the years. Too many.
|
| |
Replies: 18 / Views: 1,983 |