| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 652 |
|
Valued Member
United States
169 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5292 Posts |
Very few marks, but the toning may be obscuring the luster, and that may prevent a high MS grade. Given the muted luster and the hit on the eagle's breast, I'd say MS-64, although 65 might be possible if the luster looks good in hand.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
585 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5505 Posts |
Seems to have pretty clean fields - that mark on the eagles breast is pretty obvious and may make the difference between being a 65 compared to a 64.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2203 Posts |
I personally wouldn't spend money and send this in.
You realize when you know how to think, it empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
58373 Posts |
I'll say MS-64, maybe better.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
17518 Posts |
due to the mottled toning, the coin appears to have been either stored improperly or cleaned and and not washed properly leaving some residual that caused the toning we see. my guess is probably both. the biggest indicator is very little marks/scratches technically the coin would be MS65 however it would never pull that grade imo due to the weak luster. I have seen MS64 ones very similar so i'll go with that.
common year so she would need to pull a 65 to warrant slabbing imo
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4838 Posts |
I would dip this coin before sending it. It looks very clean underneath the mottled toning which would max it out at a 5 IMO. If it dips well a 66 wouldnt surprise me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1094 Posts |
I would go 64 here which is a market grade because of the toning. Also this date comes nice and they tend to grade a bit harder here.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6262 Posts |
PCGS shows a population of 225,000 (!) Morgan 1881-S coins grading MS-65 or better. I wouldn't consider sending this one in based on what the pictures show.
Edited by Jaobler
05/11/2025 12:27 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
13555 Posts |
Please remember to include the denomination in your message titles. I'm going to ask a moderator to edit this for you.
Take a look at my other hobby ... https://www.jk-dk.artToo many hobbies .... too much work .... not enough time. |
|
Moderator
United States
162469 Posts |
Quote:
Please remember to include the denomination in your message titles. I'm going to ask a moderator to edit this for you. Fixed. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8424 Posts |
I'll go 64 also.
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4493 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
215 Posts |
Looks MS64/65. You can get a PCGS graded 64 for around $100, so I'd weigh that vs. your potential grading costs. If you do send it in, it might be worth it to use their Restoration service. It should only be $10 for a coin like this and might get you a higher grade.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17518 Posts |
it's one of the most common morgans. this is not one I spend $$ to slab. with the eye appeal you would not get top dollar for it in whatever grade it is since there are so many nicer examples out there
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 652 |
Posted 05/09/2025 9:05 pm
