Are you reading my mind Oz? You're not one of those remote viewers are you?
Wow Dave, you have the potential to be fairly long winded if you want to be. I like that. You covered a lot of ground there, and didn't say one little thing that I would disagree with.
It has been my view that the new vammer often is the one without the patience. He or she will ask for help in identification, and it is given. He or she may then reply 'well, what about this or that?' the old vammer will reply with an explanation that is not to the new vammer's understanding or satisfaction, and will begin to argue a trivial point, which is countered with a cold shoulder. (Understandably, in my opinion).
As you implied Dave, vamming takes a certain level of financial investment, as well as time and perseverance to achieve the knowledge required to be the hunter, rather than the prey.
I do not hesitate to think that the majority of vammers are dealers rather than true collectors, and while they welcome new vammers, they wish to see the collector type joining the ranks rather than another dealer who can only be looked upon as competition. The relationship between dealers and collectors is purely symbiotic. One cannot exist without the other.
There are some vammers who consider their acquired knowledge to possess a monetary value, and take on an almost jealous nature if they feel that they are merely being asked to hand over this hard earned knowledge to someone who will only use it to make a quick profit. These folks are in the minority however, and should not be used as examples of the entire vamming community. Overall, vammers are a great bunch of people.
Yes, I too have seen the type that you speak of Nut. Those who's only interest is in the coin in hand. Which
VAM is it, so a profit can be made. I see their questions answered very quickly however, and some have been doing this for a very, very long time. Everyone knows who they are, yet their questions are answered with vigor . Selectivity seems to come into play somewhere there.
As for the attribution of a particular
VAM, perhaps what hemisboats referred to was the continuing process of weeding out those singular die pairings that have been designated in error twice with different
VAM numbers. I have seen this more than just a couple of times myself. I think that (as far as die varieties go) it will be a very, very long time, if ever, that the Morgan series develops to the state of accuracy of the capped bust halves for instance, due to the sheer volume of dies produced.
CBH for example, while I do not view as such a thing of beauty or artistic talent as encountered on the Morgan, are more appealing 'to me' because of the simplicity of identification, and understanding of scarcity based on a far more realistic rarity scale.
Consider this: 1921 remains the most common of Morgan dates, yet just try finding one listed as an R-1 or R-2. Talk about a 'daunting task'. The vast majority of 1921 Morgans, despite the mm, are listed as R-5, R-6, and R-7. (Please correct me if I am wrong about that).
While I understand that these designations of rarity were best guess judgments at time of discovery, the newbie does not consider this, because the rest of the
Coin World seems to be more established in the census of extant specimens. (An R-5 is a rare coin). It is easy for a new vammer to feel that he has been tricked into buying a coin that was referenced (on such and such a site) as being an R-5, when in reality it is just a common coin.
Now, I realize that based on the sheer number of die pairings of 1921 Morgans, and the fact that most of the extant coins have not yet been checked for die variety, possibly the rarity designations might be better restrained altogether until such time as at least a halfway accurate census assessment can be made.
New vammers enter, expecting the
VAM that they just bought is a great buy based on it's touted rarity. After the exciting purchase, they find out that the rarity factors are just a game of smoke and mirrors. It would not surprise me to learn that new vammers leave in disappointment at a rate nearly equaling that of those entering.
Vamming is growing as a bubble, and being filled with new vammers, but there are holes in the bubble, and folks are escaping to more stable investments. (That is where I see the 'waxing and waning'). I would think that unless these holes are patched up with a degree of realism (rarity factors) that the newbie can count on, actual growth will be stymied.
Sure, sales are made to the newbie, and thus the need for growth in the hobby, but one time sales are not self sustaining, so there needs to be a way of keeping these new collectors interested and involved, and dangling an 'R-6' in the face of the new vammer (who has already learned through one bad experience that this is really just a common coin) is not necessarily the best way to go about it. Maybe not all, but many new folks view the situation as a 'turn off'.
I know that this rarity factor thing is a very old issue and has been beaten to death many times, but I see it as the #1 obstacle to real growth.
These are my opinions, and I know that they differ from many people who feel that they know far more about things than I do, but I am entitled to my opinions and I am not afraid to share them. By speaking my mind, I am usually met with differences of opinion, from which I often learn new things. So if I am wrong, please teach me. If you 'are' able to teach me something, I will let you know with my thanks.