| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,141 |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
This one is graded by PCGS and in an old green holder and was wondering what you all thought the grade should be and if I should send it in to see if it will upgrade. After I think everyone has responded that wants to I will post pictures of the grade.  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1703 Posts |
I would have to say a high MS but without being able to actually hold it and go over it with a loupe its really hard to say. I can see what looks like a few contact marks to the left and below the chin and to the left and below the M and directly below the S on the obverse,but that could be on the holder,hard to tell. I would have to say MS63 witout actually holding it,Bryan.
Edited by TLS5933 06/30/2006 09:04 am
|
|
Forum Mom
 United States
5877 Posts |
The cheek looks pretty clean and the coin has some nice frosting remaining on the reverse. I'd have to say at least MS65. I wouldn't resubmit it these days, though. All of the companies have tightened up and I think it might only get a 64 now.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
14454 Posts |
I know you cant tell from the pictures but it is a PL coin on the old green holder. I dont know why my camera doesn't allow that to ever come out when I photograph a coin, I have some more PL's and even DPL's and none of them look it in the pictures for some reason
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
If I stipulate the PL, we'll call it MS65. In today's stressed-out grading market, I wouldn't resubmit it either way, though, unless it's in an MS62 slab. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
14454 Posts |
I have got to say I am impressed, I can only hope my grading skills get that good one day. I didn't really think it would upgrade but just figured I would see what everyone else said about it 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1703 Posts |
Nice one Bryan, I always lean to the conservative side unless I get my hot little mitts on it. 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts |
Hi Bryan (I'm back online for a short time, move again in a couple days)--
Based on the images, I'd guess MS-64 or MS-65. These days, the green PCGS label doesn't mean that PCGS used to undergrade their Morgans although that is a common misperception that may be (and is) capitalized upon during a sale. A resubmission of a green label to PCGS will only get you back a new label and almost certainly not a higher grade. Thus, any perceived advantage a green label may carry is lost. I can almost solidly guarantee that a green label resubmission will not result in a higher grade; I think the second "6" in their label maker is broken and I don't think PCGS is issuing MS-66s on Morgans anymore unless it's for a high-powered dealer.
As usual, I haven't looked at the other comments yet.
It's always nice to look at your Morgans!
Fred
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts |
I wouldn't have picked up on the prooflike by the images, but then a photo of a prooflike isn't gonna show the depth of a sharper-than-normal strike. I'll stick with my MS-64 or -65 guess and go along completely with my previous observation which lines up exactly with Susan's opinion: there ain't no way PCGS would upgrade it to MS-66 these days and there would be a high probability they'd downgrade it. Besides, I LIKE the green labels!
Fred
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
14454 Posts |
yeah I didn't think it would upgrade either but I usually have a tendacy to either undergrade them or grossly overgrade them so I figured I would see what others had to say about it
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4589 Posts |
I Think its MS-65 closer to the ms-66 but I agree with everyone else I dont think you would get a better grade. Now like Fred said If the right dealer sends in It will come back 68 or better LOL.. This is the who;e reson why I do not have any Certifieds in my collection...(but this is just my opionion)
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts |
quote: Originally posted by scoutjim99
I Think its MS-65 closer to the ms-66 but I agree with everyone else I dont think you would get a better grade. Now like Fred said If the right dealer sends in It will come back 68 or better LOL.. This is the who;e reson why I do not have any Certifieds in my collection...(but this is just my opionion)
Jim, the dealer would have to pull a lot of weight with PCGS to come back MS-66. He'd have to be a PCGS dealer with PNG and a lot of alphabet letters after his signature. But, it's doable. Yeah, send it to SGS and have it come back MS-70.  A slight shift in emphasis: Your point is well-taken about certification, but while even the top three TPGs often disagree with each other on a coin's grade, I feel it is very important to have a collectible coin (or any other historical artifact) permanently encapsulated to preserve it for future generations. Coin World or other non-permanent holders aren't sufficient: they come apart too easily. Sealed slabs by NGC, PCGS, or ANACS will preserve a coin far better and far longer than having them in temporary holders, mylar or cardboard/plastic flips, folders, or even loose. One compromise would be to send a coin for authentication and encapsulation only rather than for grading. Preservation is paramount; they ain't making 'em anymore (well, maybe in China). Fred
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,141 |
|