| Author |
 Replies: 71 / Views: 10,828 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1285 Posts |
Thanks all for the heads up. I saw the spike under the chin on ebay and it looks similar to the "rusty fish hook" but in my case I do not have the pitting in "O" in dollar and other marker's. Also the one on ebay had 3 spikes / clash marks coming from the chin area. FWIW, the clash on the neck that I have is stronger than the one on VW. It may be the pic that they have posted over there is being skewed by the brightness. What other "O" mint years are in this bucket / data not reliable? Thanks I got this from VW - interesting post / comments. http://www.vamworld.com/message/vie...478#10040426"re: 1904-O VAM 33A? Is this clash mark the same? shyatt01 Mar 10, 2009 1:54 pm A number of of the 1994-O's were clashed, re-clashed, polished, clashed and counter clashed, polished again, etc. 1904 must have been another big party year in New Orleans. Laissez les bons temps rouler."  Peace Edited by Ceylon62
08/02/2010 06:59 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
709 Posts |
Laissez les bons temps rouler." Let the good times roll. VAM 33 A will have a new number. |
|
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts |
VAM 33.....the Ric Ocasek VAM then.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
and why makes it get a new number?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
709 Posts |
VAM 33 A has been eliminated.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts |
Why is that Terry? Is it now ascertained that all 33s have the clash, or that the clash on the 33A has rubbed off?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
709 Posts |
VAM 33 A has been disputed for a long time. Alan Scott in his research with high grade 1904-O's was able to prove 33A was an incorrect listing. Actually Zee, the change is necessitated by die marriage.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
so what is the number it has moved to? a subvariety of __?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts |
Ahh Soo. Thenk you veddy much.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts |
Quote:
so what is the number it has moved to? a subvariety of __? The way things seem to be going, it would not surprise me if it is now 1886-S VAM 15C. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
I'm just wondering if they are going to combine the OL pitting of the VAM 1 and 4 series with the VAM 33 series or a combination of some3thing like that.. |
|
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts |
Could be, buddy.....absolutely 'anything' is possible, but I rather think that 33A will become a new discovery though....probably to the credit and glory of that "Alan" guy.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
well clearly there was some mix up from the start. as VAM 28A was a super CD "G" clashed oBverse and the 28A was listed and an "IN" clash..later revised to VAM 33...lets keep the families straight..the jacksons and the ozmonds are not of the same family..or numbering system...vam 28B had no buisness being likened to a G clash die progression...I'll have to check with my 2A and 28 to see if theres a connection..? |
|
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts |
it will now be the 35A and the old 35A was eliminated. Allen is doing some Magic with some very hard dates. His 02-O attribution guide is like no other. ANYONE can attribute 02-O's with it. It has more pictures and is more thorough than any other guide I own. Bar none. I am looking forward to this new 04-O guide.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts |
Quote:
ANYONE can attribute 02-O's with it Evidently, you don't know 'me' very well then Remmy.  |
| |
Replies: 71 / Views: 10,828 |
First Page
Previous Page
Posted 08/02/2010 12:10 pm
