Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsVancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

So I Got A Warning Msg From Paypal For Accepting 'Customer'

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 34 / Views: 3,892Next Topic
Page: of 3
Rest in Peace
coinguybrian's Avatar
United States
5375 Posts
 Posted 10/14/2010  02:08 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add coinguybrian to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
payments as personal. Except that I dont have any real customers in a real business sense (yet), just some friendly trading/selling. Anyone else get this message? What do I do, just make sure people don't include something about coins in the message? Get a new account? Thanks.
Pillar of the Community
nlp coins's Avatar
United States
2373 Posts
 Posted 10/14/2010  07:47 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nlp coins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I received the same a couple weeks back. I just requested check or M/O especially from repeat customers. Besides, it wont be long before they start sending 1099's for cumulative total of 5k. I think that is where ebay sends out statements, so I've heard.
nlp
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
carmykle's Avatar
United States
2448 Posts
 Posted 10/14/2010  10:00 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add carmykle to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Are they questioning his authenticity or ability to make a purchase?
Pillar of the Community
fioti's Avatar
United States
4212 Posts
 Posted 10/14/2010  10:28 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add fioti to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
E-gads! Not a gift! Not a prob. I've been frozen twice this year, and it seems the worst that could happen is getting called unsavory names here.
Locked
822 Posts
 Posted 10/14/2010  10:35 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add scubu to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think he's saying that they are scanning for certain words in the messages that go along with personal and gift payments like "customer". It's about time. The people abusing it are going to ruin it for people that use it the right way. Just because it's a big company doesn't mean it isn't stealing.
Rest in Peace
coinguybrian's Avatar
United States
5375 Posts
 Posted 10/14/2010  2:39 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coinguybrian to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Its a fuzzy area. I don't really want an argument, but someone who does ebay trying to circumvent a huge amount of fees isn't really the same as doing some trading with friends, which still could be considered 'personal' to an extent and used in place of slower checks. Besides, you pay the fees for the buyer protection and paypal services, which with friendly small time trading is the reason that people are okay going paypal no fee (no protection). ebay (same company) rips people off anyway with the fees, and dishonestly spun the last fee increase as a decrease. If the big companies will do whatever they can in their power to make more money (even if that means dishonesty), I see no problem with others thwarting that by bending the system a little bit.

I guess this is part of some kind of 'crackdown', glad to hear that I'm not alone in that. I'm surprised that they did it to you though nlp, did you even receive many paypal personal payments? I received a handful of them but not even that many, and on the biggest one I paid fees anyway because he funded it with CC ($67, sheesh)
Pillar of the Community
trdhrdr007's Avatar
United States
2335 Posts
 Posted 10/14/2010  2:55 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add trdhrdr007 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree with the first part of your statement & see nothing wrong with going with the gift option when trading with friends. However, if you are selling on a commercial basis, or when you add on the following quote I strongly disagree:


Quote:
Ebay (same company) rips people off anyway with the fees, and dishonestly spun the last fee increase as a decrease. If the big companies will do whatever they can in their power to make more money (even if that means dishonesty), I see no problem with others thwarting that by bending the system a little bit.


If you believe ebay's fees are excessive & that they are dishonest don't do business with them. Advocating "bending the system" might be on a smaller scale of dishonesty but it's in the same neighborhood.
Rest in Peace
coinguybrian's Avatar
United States
5375 Posts
 Posted 10/14/2010  3:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coinguybrian to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I personally do not do much more than trading with friends. I don't feel particularly strongly about this subject but I do have a lot of experience with typing out philosophical mega-posts so I'll give my full thoughts on 'morality' in business and economics and the world to an extent (warning, this is going to go on and on and on.... )


I disagree with your views based on my belief of the amorality of our economic systems (to a high extent). I also see things very differently when a company is a monopoly or a pseudo monopoly. Anyone who wants to make substantial money through auctions generally needs to use ebay, and ebay knows this well so they jack up their rates to insane levels because they know people cannot avoid using their service and other companies cannot compete with them. ebay was also doing fine on the last fee schedule, which was apparently already considered high yet they effectively doubled these fees (or more) for mid range auctions. Why? Because they can. Monopolies have no 'right' (in my view) to be monopolies or do what they do. They do what they do because they can and our society promotes this kind of behavior.

They also do many, many dishonest things to protect this money such as letting dishonest power sellers run free and deceitful marketing. They do this not to protect their livelihood and elevate their living standards to middle class, they do this as they are already filthy rich. Since I believe capitalism and its archetype (accumulating huge amounts of wealth) to be amoral, I have no problem with people bending the rules to get around it since ebay will do whatever it wants to make more money anyway.

I don't believe the above is 'good' or 'bad' (unless one needs to beat the system to fulfill some basic human need), just amoral.....like the ebb and flow of a gigantic ocean. I think that people in general should focus on the monopolies that pull these kinds of tactics over individuals who bend the rules, since if an individual bending the rules is wrong, then the monopoly pulling all kinds of dishonest things is much much more wrong. But, in the end, I don't really believe either is wrong, its just the way our system is set up and is amoral. In essence, there is little moral value in the way things are set up anyway, so bending the rules in such a system can't be immoral. Ideally, yes, the rules would be fair and accommodate everybody to a reasonable extent, and people would play by them. But it just isn't the way the world is. Things are the way they are, and they're not going anywhere.

It's the same with speed limits, in my opinion. Amoral at best, immoral at worst.....IF they are set in a way that doesn't conform to engineering safety standards, which most do not (think 55 on a wide open 8 lane interstate). I study traffic engineering in my spare time to an extent (most who get angry about this do not), and I see forum threads where people are harping on a guy for getting a 60 in a 45 construction zone ticket. Oh, you could have caused an accident, etc etc. Yet, as someone who drives a fair bit, I see 'construction zones' all the time where there is no construction active, no obstruction, a 6 lane open highway, and a speed limit of 40 to 50 mph. Most people DO slow down in the truly obstructed areas or when workers are present, so the people harping on this guy probably would have been going the same 60+ in a 45 without realizing it. I guess my point is that if the system is set up in an amoral or immoral way (monopolies being a case in point), then bending the rules isn't really wrong, its amoral at worst.

The point of the above was more to illustrate how often 'morality' can be illusive, and I guess my view of the world in general. I have a problem with people bending the rules if the rules are set up to protect people from having their basic rights violated (and as I made clear above, I don't believe all the things discussed deal with that). I just don't believe other things have moral weight. My views are different than most peoples' on this subject most likely, so I'd be interested to hear some ideas on this subject. Maybe I should have posted a new thread in general discussion...
Edited by coinguybrian
10/14/2010 3:43 pm
Pillar of the Community
Maineman750's Avatar
United States
3592 Posts
 Posted 10/14/2010  6:01 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Maineman750 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree with Trdhrdr007, if you believe a company to be dishonest,don't deal with them. Being less than honest makes us no different than them...period.
Pillar of the Community
trdhrdr007's Avatar
United States
2335 Posts
 Posted 10/14/2010  6:01 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add trdhrdr007 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I can use that exact same logic to rationalize and/or justify pretty much any action I care to take. Here's a couple examples:

It's not wrong to cheat on my wife because enough people are doing it that it's the norm.

It's ok to drink & drive because I'm still fully functional when my BAC is above the limit.

Doctoring coins for resale is ok because it's just part of the economy. Cracking coins out of problem slabs to resell is ok for the same reasons.

Edited by trdhrdr007
10/14/2010 6:03 pm
Rest in Peace
coinguybrian's Avatar
United States
5375 Posts
 Posted 10/14/2010  7:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coinguybrian to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Not really the same logic at all, I wouldn't advocate any of those things.
Pillar of the Community
wolf-n-wa's Avatar
United States
602 Posts
 Posted 10/14/2010  8:44 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wolf-n-wa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
As many of you know I deal only in cash and their is a reason why. It's called pay-pal. Never deposited $$$$ for a sale I made on ebay. And I do not have the time, patients, or computer skills to deal with that kind of B.S. WOLF
Pillar of the Community
trdhrdr007's Avatar
United States
2335 Posts
 Posted 10/15/2010  08:51 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add trdhrdr007 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Not really the same logic at all, I wouldn't advocate any of those things.


I didn't say you would advocate any of those things, neither would I. I merely stated that I could use that line of reasoning to justify almost anything.

The main thrust of your argument is that you believe the system to be amoral & therefore it's amoral to bend the rules. Here's an example of a justification I can make based on that logic:

I believe that PCGS engages in unfair business practices because they give discounts to the big players. I also suspect they give higher grades to the big players. The playing field is clearly not level so it's ok for me to bend the rules. If I see a coin slabbed as genuine by PCGS it's ok for me to crack it out & sell it without mentioning it's origins.

Edited by trdhrdr007
10/15/2010 08:53 am
Bedrock of the Community
Bryan1315's Avatar
United States
14454 Posts
 Posted 10/15/2010  10:45 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Bryan1315 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I made this same argument when everyone first started to accept gift option for payments. Paypal charges a fee for payments to people selling things, in return you get your money fast. If you get around their fees when you trade or sell (what ever you want to call it) its stealing from that company and it doesn't matter if they are a big company or the local corner store owned by grandma and grandpa kettle that sells things they grow in their garden. if you steal what they are offering its theft. I know I have heard people say I dont do enough business to hurt the big company but just think if 1000 people did it, would it hurt them then? what about a million people, what then? If the answer is yes then you can see there is a problem, you just may be that millionth person. I was surprised when they started this gift option because I knew it would be used in this matter. I don't think they will keep it very long because of people using it to get money from their "trading".

I have heard people say this is like the free miles credit card thing that everyone did with the mint but I do disagree with that statement because the credit card company was giving you that as a reward for using the card. Yes it was a loop hole but you still did what you agreed to do to get the miles, you used the card. This paypal thing you are not doing what you are asked to do. They ask if you are getting a payment for something (any kind of payment whether it be for work done or payment for items) that you pay pay pal fees for the ease of having your money fast, if yo don't want to pay the fees use another form of payment and wait for your money. There is a price to be paid for ease of use and quickness of payment. The gift option was added for people that have kids in College or something that need a few extra bucks here and there or something like that not to get out of paying fees when you "trade" your items for payment (which is selling no matter how you want to word it)
Rest in Peace
coinguybrian's Avatar
United States
5375 Posts
 Posted 10/15/2010  7:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coinguybrian to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Its not the same reasoning, though. All of those examples you previously gave violate fundamental rights. as for the last one, if you in good faith disagreed with the genuine grade, sure I'd say that was okay as long as you describe the coin to the best of your ability. I rarely do disagree with problem grades (though I do occasionally), so I see how crackout artists are frauds.

As for the second post, I could make a big rebuttal, but I'll just say that I disagree with it because it is conventional morality (which I don't go by) and leave it at that.
Rest in Peace
coinguybrian's Avatar
United States
5375 Posts
 Posted 10/15/2010  8:22 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coinguybrian to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I googled this and it appears this is almost universal.
  Previous TopicReplies: 34 / Views: 3,892Next Topic
Page: of 3

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.39 seconds to rattle this change. Forums