| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,120 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
547 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
986 Posts |
I love the reverse tone...how about MS-64.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1703 Posts |
Never get tired of looking at Morgans.  I would say MS64,can't see any major detractions.Slightly weak struck reverse.Possible S/S VAM,double struck Mint mark but I can't tell for sure without a closer pic of it. Beautiful Coin,Christina.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
I'm not sure that I can get on the MS bandwagon with this one, given the relative strength of San Francisco strikes. I'd have to see it in-hand to be sure. So, at the risk of being a spoilsport, I'm going to call it AU58. On the bright side, I think it might be a VAM-20, noting the highly tilted mintmark. Although R3, and not rare, it's one of the farthest-leaning mintmarks in the whole series and is therefore significant. Look for doubling on the right sides of the date numbers, especially the first 8. That's a key to separating the VAM-20 from the other tilted-S VAM's of that date.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
547 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1703 Posts |
I still say a strong MS64 with that second obverse pic.That "S" mintmark is a S/S doubled mint mark I believe.The 1882-S is one that had a number of weaker strikes,not like New Orleans but some.
Edited by TLS5933 09/03/2006 4:14 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1454 Posts |
quote: Originally posted by ChristinaM
I hope no one gets tires of looking at these
LOL! Sorry, don't mean to pick on ya. I don't need tires but the wife does.  I'll go MS-64 on this one. Very nice looking silver dollar and those close-up pics you took are awesome.
Edited by Irishraider 09/03/2006 4:18 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2365 Posts |
quote: Originally posted by Irishraider
[quote]Originally posted by ChristinaM
I'll go MS-64 on this one. Very nice looking silver dollar and those close-up pics you took are awesome.

|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1703 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I think its a VAM-7 which is still a R-3 but has NO shifted MM and I do not think this MM is shifted either, I think just the coin was turned in the picture. What made me choose this VAM is the die chips between the loops of both 8's and it looks like the second 8 is doubled to the left a little, of couse I cant see the 2 but its supposed to be doubled also
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
547 Posts |
I'm glad I could brighten everyones day!  As for the 2 in the date: 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Here's Leroy Van Allen's words on 1882-S strikes: Most specimens are fully struck although a few exist with slight weakness. I remain convinced that this is a slanted-S example. Use the baseline of In God we trust as the horizontal, and imagine a perpendicular line through it to the mintmark. The tilt is obvious, even in these small pics, and that's part of my reason for feeling it's a VAM-20. Here's the book description of the VAM: III#178;17ĄPC#179;e(Doubled Date, S Tilted Far Left)
Obverse III#178;16 - Entire date doubled. 1 doubled slightly on top right side of vertical shaft. First 8 doubled slightly on right outside of lower loop. Second 8 doubled slightly on left inside and strongly on right outside of upper loop. 2 doubled strongly on right outside of upper loop. Reverse C#179;e - IV S mint mark tilted far to left and shifted slightly to left. One of the farthest S tilts known. In view of the new pics, I am more firmly confident in my attribution.  Edit: Oops, I guess this forum software doesn't speak ASCII 
Edited by SsuperDdave 09/03/2006 5:37 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts |
Christina, nice Morgan. Looks like either a somewhat weak strike or lightly circulated coin, so I'm gonna say AU-58 to MS-62; the bag marks on Liberty's face and on the reverse field will keep it down somewhat. However, I'm concerned about what appears to be residual toning around the stars and within the numerals on the obverse although I don't see it to the same degree on the reverse. This Morgan may have been lightly cleaned at some point in the past. It's not that big a deal since 82-S Morgans are fairly common, but it could affect future TPG grading if you were to decide to get it slabbed. Now to take a look at the other responses. Fred
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts |
I'll stick with the AU-58 to MS-62. Like Dave said, this is one of those coins which really needs to be studied in hand since the images, as very good as they are, don't give the whole picture (npi  ). With Mint State Morgans as common as the 82-S, a TPG is gonna be rough on the grade if it proves to be MS. I am also still suspicious of what appears to be residual toning around the stars and numerals indicating a possible old cleaning. I'll let the VAM fans figure out which variety it might be. Fred
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,120 |
|