| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,711 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4333 Posts |
Dug 2 more '16 mercs this year. Hard as I look, no cigar.   When I listen to LED ZEPPELIN...so do my neighbors... Roll hunting since '77 Dirt fishing since '72
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
From what I can tell, they are Phillies.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts |
I blew up the photo, and analyzed it under my new state of the art Acme BS-2000 coin analyzer (with optional heat and massage), that can look right through the wear and dirt to see what is actually there (or used to be). Here are the results of the coin on the left. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15432 Posts |
ROTFLOL ..... fun reply zeewool ...  I agree ..... nothing there but Philly mints. David
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4333 Posts |
you had me going there for a second Zee, you joker
When I listen to LED ZEPPELIN...so do my neighbors... Roll hunting since '77 Dirt fishing since '72
|
|
Valued Member
United States
101 Posts |
yeh, you must of had your boots on today, that BS2000 is making it deep around here. I have some big copper 'slicks' from my detecting days, wonder if one is a chain cent.......
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8904 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
WELL what the _ELL was I thinking....You deserve 2 AWARDS this year Zee..\\\\And you thought know one knows.., yea your right we don't know...any way Congrads...You jokester 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
By the way I got an "in" to the Hubble scope...sorry its classified..  your eyes only kind of thing....
|
|
Valued Member
United States
183 Posts |
heard that some type of tech that can read filed serial numbers may work to read lost mint marks having to do with density of the metal where it was compressed more or less for areas with/without raised/lowered sections. but probably costs too much to be worth it for slicks
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts |
I am not buying into that just yet.... the sensitivity of such an apparatus would have to be incredible... Metals can only be compressed to finite degrees.... while it is logical that the fields could be denser than the devices, the effective measurability of the differences might be inconceivable to me.... who is going to buy into this questionable technology, much less buy a coin with invisible key features? Nope, as of right now, the Acme BS2000 is the best thing we have to work with... 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts |
Quote: heard that some type of tech that can read filed serial numbers may work to read lost mint marks having to do with density of the metal where it was compressed more or less for areas with/without raised/lowered sections. Yes, I recall reading that somewhere also.... never gave it much though until right now though.... The very notion is absolutely absurd in the case of worn devices on a coin though.... the coin's devices might be the areas of least density, but when they are worn away (down to field level), what differences could possibly remain? This is someone's pipe dream... nothing more.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts |
Actually Carl, that sounds far more logical than the wonder machine that is supposed to replace the BS2000.
|
|
Valued Member
75 Posts |
I dont think thats very funny zee..... ffd is me friend!!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,711 |